The Biden administration paid the Ukrainian government
$140 million a month to counter truth tellers like me who were compensated $250 per article published by RT and Sputnik. $140 million to tell lies, countering $250 to tell the fact-based truth.
And the FBI came after me as a Russian agent. It’s about time America realizes that the so-called “mainstream media” is as corrupt as the day is long.
And outlets like RT and Sputnik are to be trusted over outlets like CNN, MSNBC, BBC and others.
It’s time to lift the sanctions.
Let free speech reign!
oooooo
Zelensky was able to sweet talk America into giving him $billions because many of our Congressional members, as well as members of the Biden administration, were most probably on the take. The chances of all of them receiving large inheritance during the same time period are nil.
@DOGEmust investigate and hold all these “servants of the people” responsible.
oooooo
Breaking! Elon Musk Calls Out Ukrainian Dictator Zelensky For Murdering American Journalist, Gonzalo Lira
More Breaking News And Reports On Our LIVESTREAM!
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1892390338808975784
oooooo
Rapid Response 47
@RapidResponse47
In America, we hold a presidential election every four years — even during wartime.
We held an election during the Civil War. We held an election during World War II.
Before President Zelenskyy decides to lecture the American President again, he should hold an election too.
oooooo
Imagine you are an American mercenary in Ukraine today.
You are truly fucked.
If the Russians capture you, they execute you.
Because you’re not a lawful combatant.
You’re pig shit.
And soon your Ukrainian “allies” are going to project their unhappiness toward America into you.
Killing you in your sleep or executing you where you stand.
Because you’re pig shit.
And if you make it out alive, and manage to come back to the US, you’re status as an American veteran—if you indeed earned that status—will be forever tainted by the fact that you sold your services to a Nazi regime.
Certifying you as pig shit.
And (hopefully) the Justice Department will come knocking to hold you accountable for your crimes.
And you will be sent to prison.
Where pig shit belongs.
Fuck each and every one of you who betrayed your service and your nation by taking money to fight for Ukraine.
oooooo
I’m no fan of regime change.
Sovereign states should be free to pick their leaders, even when they are in fundamental disagreement with the US government and American principles and values.
But a regime must be legitimate to rule.
Not from an American standpoint.
But the legal foundation from which their authority is derived.
Zelensky is no longer a legally mandated President of Ukraine.
His continued hold on power flies in the face of Ukrainian constitutionality.
He is an affront to democracy.
And a threat to the national security of the United States.
He is the reason we have covert political action tools.
He is why the CIA exists.
Tulsi, it is time to unleash the hounds.
Find the modern day equivalent of John Richardson.
And let him do his thing.
oooooo
Breaking! Elon Musk Agrees With President Trump That Volodymyr Zelensky Is A Dangerous Dictator
More Breaking News and Reports Here: https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1ZkKzYPkogdxv
The Biden administration paid the Ukrainian government $140 million a month to counter truth tellers like me who were compensated $250 per article published by RT and Sputnik. $140 million to tell lies, countering $250 to tell the fact-based truth.
And the FBI came after me as a Russian agent.
It’s about time America realizes that the so-called “mainstream media” is as corrupt as the day is long.
And outlets like RT and Sputnik are to be trusted over outlets like CNN, MSNBC, BBC and others.
It’s time to lift the sanctions.
Let free speech reign!
oooooo
Maria Zakharova:
“On the ‘Return of the Prodigal Brands’
Western European brands didn’t leave Russia because they couldn’t handle competition or because
someone blocked their profits. They left because their masters ordered them to—the political regimes of EU member states and the Brussels bureaucracy.
And since that’s the case, they should now be seen not as economic operators, but as tools of hostile regimes waging hybrid war against Russia. They agreed to this themselves. Some of these companies have been financing the killing of our citizens for three years.
What to do with these prodigal brands will be decided by professionals across all branches of power. Russian businesses will not be traded for French rags and Italian slippers. Our manufacturers must know that their contribution to the Special Military Operation will not be betrayed.
But given the propaganda war waged by Brussels’ liberal dictatorship against our history, one thing must be guaranteed:
Let Europe learn this once and for all—if a single word from their officials questions the results of World War II, the heroism of the Red Army, or the Soviet people’s role in defeating Nazism and fascism, their companies will feel the consequences. The same goes for the memory of our heroes of the SMO.
After all, Russia can live without Hugo Boss (which produced uniforms for the Nazis), without Coco Chanel (a Nazi agent in Paris), Cristóbal Balenciaga (who dressed Franco), and Christian Dior (who tailored dresses for Nazi generals’ wives). But without historical memory and a strong, independent economy? No.
So let them not be surprised if their profits suffer because of the insane comparisons of Russia to the Third Reich by Italy’s President Mattarella, or the ignorance of Germany’s Chancellor Scholz and France’s Foreign Minister Barrot regarding who really played the decisive role in defeating German National Socialism.
And by the way, Russia’s treatment of Western brands should also reflect how Russian journalists and media are treated abroad. If NATO-Europe mocks the memory of Andrey Stenin, Darya Dugina, or Vladlen Tatarsky, or fuels smear campaigns against Russian TV and radio—then their brands should receive no preferential treatment in Russia. They’ve grown too used to insulting us without consequences.
If they don’t respect the rule of law and have no conscience, then we must force them to respect us.
That’s not my quote. That’s Pushkin.”
oooooo
THE INDIRECT APPROACH
“Throughout the ages, effective results in war have rarely been attained unless the approach has had such indirectness as to ensure the opponent’s unreadiness to meet it…In strategy, the longest way round is often the shortest way home.”
B. H. Liddell Hart, Strategy
The indirect approach has guided me throughout my life.
First and foremost, it is the approach that produces the best results, because it reduces the friction between opposing forces that generates the greatest damage.
It also requires a deeper understanding of the capabilities and objectives of both parties to a conflict, so that a better understanding of the relative strengths and weaknesses can be had.
Read the article here:
oooooo
MAGA Primary 2026@MagaPrimary2026
erabiltzaileari erantzuten
Scott.. I think you’d like this article I just wrote.
Aipamena
MAGA Primary 2026@MagaPrimary2026
Ots. 18
The Real New World Order
We are witnessing “The New World Order” right now. Not the one that Klaus Schwab or Bush Sr envisaged but a multipolar world system based on Great Power Politics.
For those unfamiliar, Great Power Politics is a system where the superpowers see each other as equals, sometimes rivals, sometimes partners. This new order will revolve around the idea of regional spheres of influence. The US, China and Russia are the great powers now. There are three “junior great powers” (Brazil, Indonesia and India). How the spheres of influence shake out will be hashed out in the next few years.
Opportunities for cooperation will be in the Middle East, space exploration and in global energy strategy. Rivalries will be driven by access to resources and markets and the AI race. The rules based international order based on the post WW2 era is over. NATO is all but irrelevant. All three great powers have a desire to reduce military spending and it’s my hope that they agree to do that.
The crushing defeat of the West in Ukraine has finally humbled the West (us) enough to know that we are simply not capable of maintaining the unipolar world order anymore.. We can aim to be first among equals and we can be with our superior system of governance and spirit of innovation but make no mistake, we are not the “only superpower” anymore. History awaits us as we turn a new page. It’s exciting. Rejoice. Pax Americana, the global empire, dies today and along with it the burden of its maintenance.
oooooo
oooooo
Europe and Zelensky went from “No negotiations with Putin!” to “We demand a seat at the negotiating table!”. You were one of those loudly cheering for “no negotuations”. You all had a chance to lead, you blew it. Now, you are on the menu.
oooooo
Vasily Goloborodko’s Nightmare
Feb 18, 2025
Volodymyr Zelensky as Vasily Goloborodko in Servant of the People
As a fan of the Ukrainian television series, Servant of the People, I can’t help but be struck by the irony of an actor who played a president transitioning into an actor who became a president. Scripts, however, are one thing. Reality is something completely different. And Volodymyr Zelensky’s last scene, unlike the character of Vasily Goloborodko he played in the series, will not have a happy ending, but rather be the stuff of nightmares.
By any standard, the tenure of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been quite a ride.
In March, 2018, coming off a three-season run as the star of the popular Ukrainian television series Servant of the People, Zelensky’s handlers filed paperwork which established a new political party in Ukraine, Servant of the People, which was little more than a ploy to politicize the role played by Zelensky in the series, an everyday Ukrainian man named Vasily Goloborodko—who went on to become President of Ukraine—so that the new Ukrainian “everyman”—Zelensky—could turn theater into reality.
The gambit worked, and in April 2019 Zelensky was elected over the unpopular incumbent, Ukrainian chocolate oligarch Petro Poroshenko.
Although he campaigned heavily on a platform that promoted peace with Russia over the ongoing fighting in the breakaway Donbas region, within weeks of becoming president, Zelensky had taken a hard tack to the right, promising to wage war with Russia over the disputed territories.
And in February 2022, the actor-turned-President got his wish.
He immediately fell into his designated role, operating from a script written for him by his western handlers (it was the CIA who manufactured the now-famous line, “The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride”), rejecting an alleged offer from the United States to evacuate him from Kiev, which was at the time under attack by Russia.
As it turns out, both the offer of a ride and Zelensky’s sharp retort were works of fiction—neither occurred but rather were brought to life by a compliant media which published verbatim the narrative fed to them by unnamed US intelligence officials working in the US Embassy in Kiev.
But the CIA script writers could not make the military pressure placed on Ukraine by the Russian Special Military Operation go away, and less than a week after the Russian assaults began, Zelensky was compelled to dispatch a delegation to Gomel, Belarus, to begin negotiations designed to bring the conflict to an end. These negotiations eventually moved to Turkey where, in late March, the two sides had hammered out a comprehensive peace agreement, the so-called “Istanbul communique,” which would have brought the conflict to an end on terms which, in retrospect, were extremely favorable to Ukraine.
The Istanbul round of negotiations, March 2022
But Zelensky’s new western production had decided that the pilot of a Russian-Ukraine conflict was too profitable not to be converted into a series, and so Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister of the UK, flew to Kiev and convinced the actor-turned-president that the show must go on.
And go on it did.
The collective west, now fully backing the new Zelensky series as an action-based drama, poured billions of dollars into production, transforming a simple tale of surviving against all odds into a David-versus-Goliath epic.
Zelensky himself was recast as a Churchillian figure, a larger-than-life character whose exhortations to “fight them on the beach” quickly captured the imagination of the world.
The first season was a huge success, with Zelensky leading his embattled troops to victory, reclaiming lost territory in Kharkov and Kherson, and setting up a climactic second season which would see Ukraine roll on to victory.
The producers went all out promoting the second season, complete with trailers depicting the victory of Ukraine’s military over Russia in what was being billed as the “2023 Summer Counteroffensive.”
Destroyed Ukrainian armor, the aftermath of the 2023 Summer Counteroffensive
But production ran into some insurmountable obstacles. The budget for the “2023 Summer Counteroffensive” was more than the underwriters were willing to spend, and then there was a writer’s strike which saw major changes in the script—rather than delivering a dramatic victory, the drama would devolve into a bloody stalemate.
The problem was the audience had been sold on the original script, which had been reflected in the trailers. Denied their victory, viewership began to decline, and money for the show’s grandiose episodes declined.
Unable to provide victory, the screenwriters worked on turning the action drama into a character-driven show. This required re-writing the Churchillian figure Zelensky had grown accustomed to playing into a more tragic character who saw his dreams of glory slip through his fingers.
Season Three tried to squeeze as much entertainment from this approach, but to no avail.
The producers were being bombarded with counter-offers of new programing, including a big-budget concept surrounding a tale of reconciliation between brothers who had once been friends, but were now violently opposed to one another.
The real-life Servant of the People had lost its appeal.
Its underwriters were cutting off the funds.
A lonely Zelensky at the 2023 NATO Summit in Vilnius
Producers and screenwriters were jumping ship to join the team pushing the tale of brotherly reconciliation.
Which left the remaining production team with the problem of how to wrap up not only Season Three, but the series as a whole.
Back in 2018 the producers of Servant of the People solved their problem by transitioning from the screen to reality, turning Vasily Goloborodko into Volodymyr Zelensky.
They wrote nightmare scripts, creating scenes that depicted the rise and fall of Zelensky’s character, only to have the series end in victory.
But there isn’t a screenwriter in existence who can turn the real-life drama of Voldymyr Zelensky into a happy ending.
Goloborodko’s nightmare, which began Season Three of the television version of Servant of the People, has become Zelensky’s reality—hemmed in on all sides by people who seek to depose him, with no way out.
Instead of a carefully scripted narrative, Zelensky has turned to drug-fueled impromptu ad libs which have turned tragedy into farce.
Where once the world cheered on the Churchillian hero Zelensky portrayed, they now have nothing but pity for the despicable character Zelensky plays today.
We are now in Season Four.
There is one last act to be had before the series can be closed down, and the producers are considering competing scripts.
Zelensky today
One has the tragic hero flee to a life in exile, where he can reflect on the causes of his collapse.
The other, written by admirers of the HBO series The Sopranos, has a more bloody, fatal ending for the everyman-turned-dictator.
But the bottom line is Season Four of the real-life version of Servant of the People will not end well for Zelensky.
And the reality is none of those who once sold him as the second coming of Churchill will give a damn.
oooooo
Feb 20, 202
Trump didn’t mince words when he called Zelensky “a dictator without elections,” and questioned why he estimates that the U.S. has spent over $350 BILLION on the war in Ukraine, and Zelensky claims half of the funds are “missing.” This, after Zelensky accused Trump of falling for Russian propaganda, being stuck in a “disinformation bubble,” and he claimed that Ukraine is “not for sale.”
Scott Ritter, a former UN Weapons Inspector and U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence Officer, noted that the divide we are seeing over support for Ukraine has the power to lead to the “collapse” of the NATO alliance, as Trump distances himself from Europe and chooses to pursue normalization with Russia… while politicians from the EU and the UK gather to pout and argue over the next steps for Kiev.
and check out Scott Ritter Extra on Substack
SOURCE LINKS:
- 19 Feb. 2025 – Trump on Truth Social: “A Dictator without Elections, Zelenskyy better move fast or he is not going to have a Country left.”
- 19 Feb. 2025 – Trump and Zelensky trade barbs as US-Ukraine relations sour over the war with Russia
- 19 Feb. 2025 – Trump brands Zelensky ‘dictator without elections’
- 18 Feb. 2025 – European leaders want a say in talks to end Russia’s war in Ukraine. The US is brushing them off
Check out Episode 23: Zelensky’s Temper Tantrum Escalates As Ukraine Left Out of US-Russia Talks
oooooo
The Rise and Fall of Agent Zelensky
Revisiting a Scott Ritter Investigation
Feb 19, 2025
That Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s political fortunes have been on a downward trajectory over the course of the past year is undeniable. The accelerated collapse of Zelensky as a legitimate governing authority in Ukraine that has transpired over the course of the past few days was unimaginable. That Zelensky would double down by carrying out a personal attack against Donald Trump is unthinkable.
Back in the summer of 2023, I tried to warn the American people, and the world, about the illegitimacy and inherent instability of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. I helped write and produce a two-part exposé of the one-time comedian titled “Agent Zelensky.”
Part One was well received when I published it on YouTube.
(Video, part one: https://rumble.com/v2zs3r0-a-scott-ritter-investigation-agent-zelensky-part-1.html)
Too well received.
The Ukrainian intelligence services, which had flagged me as a Russian disinformation agent and marked me for death by putting me on an infamous liquidation list, reached out to their FBI contacts in the Legal Attache office of the US Embassy in Kiev, and demanded that action be taken.
The appropriate authorities at YouTube were approached by the FBI, and soon the Agent Zelensky video was removed from the platform.
Part Two of Agent Zelensky suffered the same fate within hours of being published.
(Video, pat two: https://scottritter.substack.com/p/a-scott-ritter-investigation-agent)
Then the Department of Justice tasked the FBI with eliminating the source of Agent Zelensky—me.
They targeted me for allegedly being an unregistered agent of the Russian government, trampling my status as an independent journalist whose speech was protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
The FBI raided my home and seized my computers, all to intimidate me while the Department of Justice scrambled to make a case against me as an unregistered Russian agent.
They failed.
And now there is a new sheriff in town—President Donald Trump.
Trump has decriminalized free speech and shut down those in the Department of Justice who violated free speech protections for political purposes.
Moreover, Trump has come to the realization that Volodymyr Zelensky is an unstable person whose ongoing role as President of Ukraine is detrimental to the national security of the United States.
The fate of Zelensky will be decided in the coming days.
And, as such, there is no better time than the present to expose the corrupt roots of this corrupt dictator by republishing Agent Zelensky so everyone has access to the truth about the madman responsible for the deaths of more than a million of his countrymen and who helped bring the US and Russia to the brink of a world-ending nuclear conflict.
Enjoy the film.
This time, the FBI is not watching you.
oooooo
Scott Ritter on the Future of the Russia-Ukraine War
https://patricklancasternewstoday.substack.com/p/scott-ritter
Scott Ritter on the Future of the Russia-Ukraine War
(https://patricklancasternewstoday.substack.com/p/scott-ritter-on-the-future-of-the)
(Video, inside the article)
Scott Ritter on the Future of the Russia-Ukraine War
Feb 19, 2025
The conflict in Ukraine has been one of the most geopolitically charged and consequential wars of the modern era. As new shifts emerge on the global stage, questions linger about what lies ahead for Russia, Ukraine, the United States, and NATO. To get a deeper perspective on these unfolding events, I sat down with former Marine Corps intelligence officer and weapons inspector Scott Ritter for a no-holds-barred discussion on the realities of the war and the future of global power dynamics.
Scott Ritter has spent decades analyzing U.S. military strategy, arms control, and global security. His experience as a UN weapons inspector in Iraq, a Cold War intelligence officer, and a long-time observer of Russian affairs gives him a unique lens through which to assess the current crisis.
From his early days inspecting nuclear arms in the Soviet Union to his role in exposing U.S. manipulation in Iraq, Ritter has never shied away from speaking the hard truths. And now, he’s doing it again—this time about Ukraine, NATO, and the shifting balance of power in Europe.
The Endgame in Ukraine
As we begin the interview, Ritter wastes no time in cutting through the mainstream narratives. The idea that Ukraine could return to its 2014 borders, he says, was never realistic—not before, not now, and not in the future.
? “The Secretary of Defense of the United States has already said that reclaiming the pre-2014 borders of Ukraine is an ‘unrealistic objective.’ That’s Washington’s way of saying, ‘this war is lost.’”
The war, according to Ritter, has reached a turning point. Ukraine’s military has suffered devastating losses, and its Western backers are quietly walking away. Even key Ukrainian figures—like Kiev’s mayor, Vitali Klitschko—are openly talking about ‘painful compromises’ to end the war.
And then there’s Trump.
Donald Trump, he argues, represents a total shift in U.S. policy—one that NATO and Europe must now reckon with. Trump has signaled that he wants to bring Russia back to the G7 and pivot U.S. focus away from Europe and toward China and domestic issues.
? “Trump is not interested in prolonging the war. He is interested in stabilizing Europe so that America can leave.”
But how does that happen?
The Negotiation Nobody Wants to Talk About
One of the most explosive points in our discussion was Ritter’s forecast for the future of Ukraine’s borders. He believes the war will end not with total victory for either side, but through a series of brutal, politically difficult negotiations.
? “There will be tough compromises on both sides. The question is: what does Russia want, and what is it willing to settle for?”
Potential Outcomes According to Ritter
Russia will secure all of Donetsk and Luhansk. The fighting won’t stop until the entire Donbass is firmly under Russian control.
Ukraine will NOT regain Crimea. That’s off the table permanently.
Russia may demand territorial adjustments in Kharkov. A redefined border could emerge as part of the final deal.
Ukraine might retain some of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. But only in exchange for guarantees that it remains demilitarized and politically neutral.
? “Is it in Russia’s interest to fight for every inch of the right bank of Kherson? Probably not. If they can trade land in Zaporizhzhia or Kharkov for a long-term security deal, they might consider it.”
Of course, any suggestion of territorial compromise will be a hard sell to the Russian people. But history, Ritter reminds us, is full of border adjustments and political agreements that have reshaped nations.
The Death of NATO: Munich 2025
Perhaps the most shocking claim from Ritter was his declaration that NATO is effectively dead—and that the Munich Security Conference of 2025 will be remembered as the event that killed it.
? “This was the moment when Europe realized the U.S. is leaving. The father-son relationship between America and Europe is over. NATO is collapsing.”
Why? Because Europe now faces two brutal realities:
1⃣ The U.S. is not going to bankroll European security anymore. Trump has made it clear: Europe must defend itself.
2⃣ There is no European alternative to NATO. The EU cannot fund, organize, or sustain a military alliance strong enough to replace NATO.
This means that Europe will be forced into new security arrangements—ones that may include negotiations with Russia. A peace deal in Ukraine isn’t just about ending the war—it’s about reshaping the entire security structure of Europe.
? “Europe is realizing Ukraine is an anchor around its neck. It has to go. And that means dealing with Moscow on Moscow’s terms.”
What Comes Next?
If Ritter is right, the coming months will be defined by hard choices:
? Ukraine will have to accept that NATO membership is permanently off the table.
? Europe will have to face the reality that American military support is fading.
? Trump and Putin will enter into serious negotiations about Europe’s security order.
And the U.S.? It will shift its focus to China and the Pacific, leaving Europe to clean up its own mess.
? “For the first time in decades, the U.S. is looking for an exit strategy from Europe. The question is: will Europe survive the transition?”
Final Thoughts
Scott Ritter’s analysis presents a stark but realistic vision of the future. Ukraine will not win this war. NATO is weakening. And the U.S. is repositioning itself for a new era of global power competition.
The war in Ukraine is not just a military conflict—it is the collapse of an old world order and the painful birth of a new one.
? “Reality is taking over.”
The only question left: is the West ready for it?
oooooo