Quantcast
Channel: Heterodoxia
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 314

Israel eta NATO zale estatu guztiak Palestinaren aurka (6)

$
0
0

***

US President Harry Truman (1945-1953) stands next to a map showing the State of Palestine.

Israel is not real.

****

I SWEAR TO BE LOYAL TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PALESTINE” SIGNED BY ISRAELIS WHEN EMIGRATING FROM EUROPE IN THE 1930s

oooooo

Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis@DrLoupis

Jacob Rothschild: “My family created Israel

Israel is a fake state created by evil globalists.?￰゚ヌᄆ

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1835237143465119783

oooooo

UN General Assembly overwhelmingly calls for end of Israeli occupation

Read the resolutions text here: https://www.un.org/unispal/icj-and-question-of-palestine/

oooooo

BRICS News@BRICSinfo

Reporter: “Zelensky says that Russia plans to use tactical nuclear weapons.”

Russian Foreign Minister: “He says many things. Depends on what he drinks or what he smokes.”

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1839521659847364860

oooooo

The main witness in the case of the usurpation of power by Zelenskyy was poisoned!

Alexander Tupitsky, the head of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, was poisoned with mercury in Vienna.

Zelensky illegally dismissed Tupitsky from the post of the head of Constitutional Court in Ukraine. Then Tupitskiy won against Zelenskyy in court and proved that Zelenskyy had committed a crime!

This is an usurpation of power!

Repost!

Irudia

Irudia

oooooo

Ben Norton@BenjaminNorton

Many foreign leaders like Venezuelan President Maduro are denied their legal right to speak at the UN, because the US rogue regime would arrest them.

But genocidal fascist Netanyahu orders war crimes while visiting the UN in New York.

This is the US empire’s “Rules-Based” Reich

Aipamena

The Cradle@TheCradleMedia

Ira. 27

BREAKING | Netanyahu gave the orders to wipe out an entire neighborhood in southern Beirut from the UN headquarters in New York.

Irudia

Irudia

oooooo

The bombs used in the attack on Beirut southern suburb were 1-ton MK-84 bombs. ?￰゚ヌᄌ US-supplied Bombs ?￰゚ヌᄌ US-supplied Aircrafts ?￰゚ヌᄌ US-supplied Intelligence “We’re not involved” they say.

Irudia

Aipamena

MenchOsint@MenchOsint

Ira. 27

?￰゚ヌᄌ?￰゚ヌᄆ⚡?￰゚ヌᄃ Two E-3B Sentry AWACS off Lebanon, with transponders switched off, and the aircrafts reappear a few minutes after the bloody Israeli airstrikes on Beirut. There is no coincidence, the US helps Israel bombing Lebanon on a daily basis. The reason why they don’t admit it x.com/lebanonjets/st…

Aipamena

LebanonPrivateJets@LebanonJets

ira. 27

#Beirut #Lebanon

oooooo

Chay Bowes@BowesChay

Some thoughts for the plane ride back to Kiev

Irudia

oooooo

LEGENDARY “If you can’t sleep because of the Ukraine conflict just imagine it’s Africa or the Middle East, imagine Ukraine is Palestine and Russia is the US” – Lavrov

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1839563120131637687

oooooo

Argentina’s poverty rate has surged to 52.9 per cent under its government’s austerity programme, in a warning sign for libertarian President Javier Milei as his popularity begins to falter…the worst in two decades…3.4mn Argentines have fallen into poverty this year.”

Aipamena

FT Economics@fteconomics

ira. 26

Argentina’s poverty rate soars above 50% under Javier Milei https://on.ft.com/4gznwzz

oooooo

Mark Curtis@markcurtis30

·

ira. 27

Amazing, isn’t it that (a) the Israel lobby has funded a quarter of British MPs and that (b) the most prolific of these funders, Labour & Conservative Friends of Israel, don’t declare their funders and are not required to.

oooooo

Going Underground@GUnderground_TV

A photo which allegedly shows Benjamin Netanyahu giving the order to bomb and decimate an area of Beirut the size of a city block in order to kill Hassan Nasrallah, from the Headquarters of the UN in New York

There is no clearer indication of Israeli, American, British, and European impunity than this. This photo alone highlights the need for BRICS, a strengthened SCO, and new world order

Irudia

oooooo

@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu

The letter that led to the founding of Israel | Featured Documentary https://youtu.be/vLIBZ1Fewco?si=HkHRaGEcutZA09VL

Honen bidez:

@YouTube

youtube.com

ooo

The letter that led to the founding of Israel | Featured Documentary

(Bideoa: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLIBZ1Fewco)

In November 1917, Britain’s Balfour Declaration opened the door to the founding of Israel 30 years later. And it has had a major impact on the Middle East.

The British government issued a public statement that contained a letter from Foreign Minister Arthur Balfour to Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community. He forwarded it to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. It began, “His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people” and was the first public statement of support for Zionism by a major political power.

Transkripzioa:

0:06

[Music]

0:28

is call

0:36

[Applause]

0:43

[Music]

0:51

[Applause]

0:57

the z b

1:03

[Music] the voice of David benan declaring the

1:10

establishment of the state of Israel in May

1:20

[Music] 1948 the balfor Declaration was a letter

1:28

sent by British foreign secretary Arthur balfor to a member of the British House

1:33

of Lords Lord Rothchild on the 2nd of November

1:39

[Music] 1917 this letter sent to a leading

1:44

figure in the British Jewish Community a 100 years ago had repercussions which

1:50

even its authors cannot have [Music] imagined whatever its real intentions it

1:58

went on to have a profound impact on the Middle East and its people and its effects still resonate

2:06

across the region [Music]

2:21

today in 1914 these soldiers were fighting on the battlefields of Europe

2:26

in the first world war the allies Britain France and Russia fought the

2:33

Central Powers of Germany Austria Hungary and the Ottoman Empire for 4

2:39

years but the land and sea war was not the only

2:45

Battleground muscle was also being flexed behind closed doors as allies

2:50

conspired how to redraw maps to their own Advantage when the conflict eventually ceased of this area and

2:58

expand out in this Reg Sir Mark Sykes for the British and franois Jorge Pico for the French

3:05

plotted how to divide the Arab lands of the Ottoman Empire assuming it would

3:10

finally fall the syes Pico agreement planned secretly to divide it into French and

3:17

British spheres of influence France taking most of the Levant Southern Anatolia and the musul area while the

3:25

British extended their control over the southern Levant expanding Eastward to Bagdad and Basra and all the land

3:32

between the Arabian Gulf and the French territory historic Palestine then still

3:39

part of the Ottoman Empire was a bone of contention and would be put under

3:45

International [Music]

3:58

Administration

4:23

[Music] that

4:36

I think the British felt that there had not been enough government involvement

4:42

in concluding the sypo agreement with the French and in that process they had

4:47

not really Protected Their interests well enough for a post-world War era in

4:54

which the British Empire would continue to seek to be a dominant force in European Affairs and so

5:00

really officials across White Hall including Mark syes himself felt it was a bad

5:28

deal and it’s of huge significance that when

5:34

they’re making these discussions Jews and Zionism are not discussed Jews were not to feature in the new cartography of

5:42

the Middle East which was to be based on the idea of the Arab

5:48

Nation Zionism was the movement supporting the establishment of a Jewish homeland in the area it defined as the

5:55

historic land of Israel the move movement was active in

6:00

early 20th century London especially because of the persecution of Jews in

6:06

Russia and Eastern Europe Theodore Herzel had founded the

6:11

Zionist movement in the late 19th century but Jewish people in Western Europe had not rushed to support it

6:18

because they were integrating quite successfully into society zionists believed that all Jews should someday

6:25

return to that country one of the problems was that Palestine belonged to the Ottoman Empire and the Ottoman

6:32

Empire um was not clear that it wanted massive Jewish immigration into

6:37

Palestine and the British government offered to let Jews move unimpeded in

6:44

great numbers into Uganda if they wished um but in any event it really didn’t

6:50

happen and it didn’t happen because a majority of zionists felt that Herzel

6:57

was selling them out and that the only place for Jews to move back to or at

7:02

least conscious Zionist Jews to move back to was Palestine in this I think

7:08

Britain began to look on the Zionist movement as a possible partner in justifying a renegotiations of their

7:15

agreement with the French you see for Britain simply to claim territory against what they’ already concluded in

7:21

an agreement with France could create diplomatic problems for the British but if they were to make a claim to

7:27

Palestine not out of self interest but in order to advance a great historic

7:33

ideal of the restoration of the Jewish people to their biblical Homeland that this could justify an adjustment of the

7:41

terms of syes Pico in a way that the French would accept the British wanted

7:47

somehow uh and and more and more increasingly they felt that the Jews

7:53

held the key to winning the war um and so they had to figure out how to bribe

8:01

the Jews to support them Sir Mark Sykes had succeeded in

8:07

drawing the line he wanted from acre in the west to Kook in the East but for

8:13

some in government this was not enough opportunity toize control over the

8:19

British were using the Jewish national movement to secure Palestine for themselves this is when Heim vitman is

8:25

really going to find open ears and tend Downing Street in the foreign office in

8:31

the colonial office and it’s Paving the way towards that critical decision in

8:37

November of 1917 and so I think you can direct you can draw a direct

8:42

connection between Britain’s sudden acknowledgment of Zionism as an idea and

8:49

an ideal and what they were disatisfied with in the terms of

8:56

sypo Kim vitman was a chemistry lecturer in Manchester who had become a prominent

9:02

member of the British Zionist movement he was politically well connected and rubbed shoulders with

9:09

senior figures in government so hyim vitman was uh Russian by birth he was a

9:17

chemist um and then he joined the Zionist movement um he climbed in the

9:23

Zionist movement he moved to Great Britain before the war well before the war Maybe 10 years before the War Began

9:31

he was not before the war very well known in the English Zionist movement he

9:38

was pretty well known in the world Zionist Federation um but he was by no

9:43

means the most visible Zionist when World War I began in Great Britain vitman later wrote in his

9:50

memoirs about having been introduced to a British government Minister Herbert

9:57

Samuel Samuel was Jewish but vitman was apparently concerned that

10:02

he might be anti-zionist however Herbert Samuel

10:07

turned out to be extremely receptive to vitman and went on to write an official memo in

10:13

1915 setting out a number of different possibilities for Palestine and the

10:18

Jewish

10:24

people um Health Minister HEI

10:58

for

11:17

but he didn’t find willing ears in whiteall or in the colonial office for

11:23

schemes that involved the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine Britain

11:29

was really concerned with two things by the time that the first world war had broken out they wanted to win the war

11:35

first and foremost this was an imperative for the survival of Britain and its Empire and secondly they wanted

11:42

to ensure that coming out of the war Victorious that their empire would benefit from the victory so at this

11:50

stage Kim vitman and Herbert Samuel’s ideas about the rights of the Jews to

11:55

settle in Palestine did not find much sympathy in the corridors of power in

12:01

London a disappointed vitman wrote to a friend asking whether there wasn’t at

12:06

least a discussion to be had about what he called the chance for the Jewish

12:13

people I realized of course he went on we cannot claim anything we are much too

12:19

atomized for it what the debate did do however was to

12:25

throw together vitmen the Russian Jewish immigrant searching for Homeland and refuge from persecution with Herbert

12:32

Samuel and Lord Rothschild firm members of the British Jewish Elite established

12:38

in society and part of the political and capitalist

12:44

class Zionism for the most part across all of the community was actually in the

12:51

minority but certainly most of all within the Jewish Elite because it

12:56

threatened the notion of them as 100% committed members of British

13:04

society and this was complete anatha for somebody like EDR montigue who becom

13:10

Secretary of State for India for him Zionism is his worst nightmare the idea

13:15

that Jews are not satisfied simply with being citizens of Britain or other countries around the world but always

13:22

longing to go back to the land of Israel for him he wanted to demonstrate that

13:27

the Jews of Britain were first and foremost British it’s important to remember that

13:35

for people like Rothchild Zionism had actually been a threat you see the elite

13:41

in British jewelry had fought for generations to gain Acceptance in British Society it was only with the

13:47

arrival of Disraeli in the 19th century that Jews entered Parliament and could rise to become Prime Minister and for

13:55

people of High Finance or banking interests the

14:01

real elite of the Jewish community in Britain their struggle to demonstrate

14:07

their place in British Society meant that Zionism with its claims that Jews were a people apart and should be a

14:15

nationalist movement in their own right were

14:27

anathema

14:57

when

15:13

it’s vitman that makes the difference and I think he was probably unique in his ability to persuade leading British

15:23

figures that the Jews were in fact a vast subterran Ian influence which they

15:30

were not um that all Jews were zionists which was far from the truth and that

15:37

therefore the key to winning Jewish support was to offer them Palestine

15:44

vites men talked up the degree to which the Jewish community supported Zionism in order to get his message across to

15:51

the government but for the British it seemed to be about self-interest about winning

15:58

the war recognizing Zionism would be closely linked to gaining Global Jewish support

16:04

for this objective on which it saw its future resting so the British motives

16:09

for supporting Zionism really we can boil it down to two elements of British

16:16

self-interest at that time not an emotional interest in Zionism or a love

16:22

of Jews and the Jewish plight and a desire for a return of the Jews to the Holy Land no for very specific

16:30

self-interest matters of policy they were first of all all of the British

16:36

government agreed that they wanted to mobilize behind Britain and the Allies

16:42

this idea of Jewish power in the world they were like all of the different

16:48

policy Elites in the war believers in the notion that Jews were of tremendous

16:54

influence in the corridors of power around the globe if the British government appeared to support Zionism

17:00

they would win over World jewelry to their side and all that that entailed the British were convinced that

17:08

Zionism was really at the center of the Jewish heart in May 196 Sir Mark Sykes had

17:16

agreed his secret deal with the French Sykes Pico would form the basis of the

17:22

future carve up of the old Ottoman Empire so he immediately turned his

17:28

attention to Palestine still part of the Ottoman Empire and how to use Zionist

17:33

Ambitions to outmaneuver the French formal contact between the

17:39

British government and the Zionist followed he immediately phoned Herbert

17:45

Samuel and told him about the plan and Herbert Samuel then phoned Kim vitman

17:52

and vitman brought with him naham sakalo this meeting took place on the

17:58

11th of April 1916 it took place at Moses gaster’s house in

18:04

mavil um and gaster wrote in his diary afterwards how proud he was that this

18:11

meeting which he thought was the most important meeting that had ever taken place in the history of Zionism had

18:17

taken place at his

18:27

house

18:38

and Moses gasta very quickly understands that syes is looking to gain support from supposed Jewish power in the world

18:45

and gasta works with this idea and manipulates this to consolidate sykes’ interest in Zionism and we see actually

18:53

the British government becomes very close already in 1916 of issuing a public declaration in support for

18:59

Zionism now in the end this doesn’t happen that year the plan syes gotot

19:06

Herbert Samuel to pass on to the Zionist leaders involved joint British French

19:11

administration of Palestine and a charter guaranteeing British support for

19:17

[Music] Zionism but his idea was

19:24

[Music] rejected they didn’t want an Anglo French condominium in Palestine they

19:32

wanted the British uh to protect them not the French and that’s because they

19:37

thought that the French always sort of converted their colonized people into

19:45

becoming Frenchmen and what they wanted was to remain as self-conscious Jews and

19:51

they thought that the British uh would leave them alone and let them do

19:57

that

20:27

man bolstered by their Newfound credibility the British zionists thought about

20:33

making specific demands after the Sykes meeting but events soon overtook

20:39

them on the 6th of December 1916 British prime minister aswith

20:46

resigned in the change of government Arthur balur became foreign secretary

20:52

under Prime Minister David Lloyd George Lloyd George is CS

21:06

[Music]

21:14

[Music]

21:23

[Music] de

21:31

alfor was of rather philosophical bent uh and I I think he uh wanted to think

21:40

in theological terms uh he wanted to think in historical terms um uh and it

21:48

was with that frame of mind I think that that he uh approached the whole

21:57

question

22:24

[Music] David Lloyd George AJ balur and all of

22:30

those who supported the Baler declaration within the British government we can absolutely categorize

22:36

as being Riven with anti-semitic thinking and not only that but the thinking behind the Baler declaration

22:43

that drove them to the Baler Declaration was from this anti-semitic thought the

22:48

idea of Jewish power of Jewish cohesiveness and of a unified Jewish attachment to Zionism Above All

22:56

Else [Music] whatever its basis the relationship

23:03

between the British zionists and the government would continue to grow throughout

23:09

1917 leading to the Declaration that would change the face of the Middle East

23:15

and ultimately determine the Destinies of two different

23:20

peoples by 1917 the war was shifting in the Allies favor and in the Middle East the British

23:28

were moving through Sinai towards the borders of historic

23:34

Palestine further north the Russian Revolution in February 1917 cast doubt on Russia’s continued

23:42

involvement in the war as Britain and France tried to

23:47

outmaneuver one another the British Zionist movement took on increasing

23:52

political importance syes wants to get back in touch with uh zionists and think about

24:00

how to incorporate Zionism in British planning for Palestine and at this moment we see a

24:07

hugely important meeting taking place in the home of Moses Gast made devil in

24:12

February of 1917 and this is the point in which uh

24:18

syes meets for the first time Kim vitman andum

24:23

sov um and other zionists in which it’s discussed what the zionists looking for

24:29

um and the British interest in Zionism so he had to bring the zionists along

24:34

without divulging what were the secret agreements that Britain and France had

24:40

come to with regard to Palestine which was that they would jointly administer parts of Palestine at this meeting uh

24:47

for the British government was Sykes and Herbert Samuel he was there on the other

24:53

side there were um vitmen and tuo uh and

24:59

there was Moses gaster and he brought a couple of his allies because he realized

25:05

that vitman was beginning to push him out of the way the other very important figure was James Roth’s child uh who

25:12

attended this meeting um at the meeting it became clear to

25:21

Sykes that vitman not gaster was the most important Zionist

25:30

this is also the moment where Moses gasta is dislodged um sy’s partner on the French

25:37

side Pico hadn’t liked gasta gasta had been insistent that there should be a Jewish State and nothing less coming

25:44

into being after the war and Pico uh clearly wanted zionists who were much

25:49

more willing to compromise with the interests of the great powers and nakum sakov and K vitman were certainly happy

25:55

to fit that bill the meetings between the zionists and

26:00

the government seem to give momentum to the idea of British support for a Jewish homeland in

26:06

Palestine and their potential role in its

26:12

Administration but the secret syes Pico agreement between Britain and France

26:18

which formed the basis of the future division of the Ottoman Empire plan to put Palestine under International

26:26

Administration any change would have to be negotiated with France naam sov emerged as the man to

26:34

talk to the [Music]

26:45

French Soo became the acknowledged lead

26:51

Diplomat for Zionism and all the accounts say that he had an extremely

26:57

sort of elegant bearing and wore very fine clothing and that his manners were

27:04

uh polished and polite and smooth silky smooth um so that he could talk um um on

27:12

an equal basis with the representatives of the Germans Kaiser or the British

27:20

government or whatever so the day after the meeting um between Sykes and the

27:27

iist leaders Sykes brought Soo to meet

27:33

the French diplomat uh Pico what Sykes wanted was for

27:40

suo to a persuade Pico that Zionism must

27:46

be taken seriously that Zionism uh really was the key to winning

27:52

the war um um and that the zionists

27:58

would only help the Allies win the war if Britain was the

28:05

main power in Palestine not

28:26

France

28:48

British

28:56

cabinet already it’s hard to know how much influence Sykes ultimately had over

29:03

British policymaking he was given more prominence in British policymaking around the Middle East during the War

29:09

years than he ever deserved he was a relatively ill-educated inexperienced

29:14

man whose only connection to the ottoman world had been as a

29:19

tourist so for this man to be playing such a role in the halls of power over deciding British policy towards the near

29:27

East seems to us today to be anomalous indeed

29:32

ridiculous regardless of sy’s role things continued to progress for the zionists and in June 1917 British

29:41

foreign secretary Arthur balur asked Kim vitman to present his demands as a

29:47

declaration and promised to try and persuade his government to adopt it the leading zionists formed a

29:54

political committee and drafted their demands and then submitted them to the British

30:01

government this original document was one of the first drafts written at the Imperial Hotel in London on the 17th of

30:09

July 1917 it also introduced a new term and

30:15

concept the national home of the Jewish people so in the initial Zionist

30:22

drafting uh of the Declaration um there were protests amongst sist leaders to nakum

30:30

sov that there’s no mention of the terminology of a Jewish state that

30:36

instead they’re talking about a national home and said that this is a betrayal of what the sists are trying to achieve and

30:43

sof’s response was that we mustn’t go too far

30:49

we have to take small steps we have to go with what is acceptable to the British government at this time and then

30:56

slowly slowly we can advance our cause once we have this in

31:25

hand on the 18th of sep September 1917 there was a meeting of the British

31:30

war cabinet though foreign secretary Arthur balur was

31:35

absent the Secretary of State for India Edwin monteu who was Jewish strongly

31:42

disagreed with a declaration he was opposed to Zionism and said I deny that Palestine is today

31:50

associated with the Jews or properly be regarded as a fit place for them to live

31:56

Monte thought a French declaration supporting Zionism in June 1917 was

32:02

anti-semitic and negotiated changes to the British version as it went through several

32:26

drafts

32:56

for a few days later Secretary of State for

33:01

war vicount Milner and the Jewish politician Philip Magnus sent a modified

33:07

version to the cabinet it Incorporated some of Monte’s

33:13

changes including the caveat that quote nothing shall be done that might

33:19

Prejudice the rights and political status enjoyed by such Jews who are fully contented with their existing

33:26

nationality and

33:31

citizenship drafting especially by Lord Milner that appeared by September was

33:38

closer to the language that would eventually be adopted in November of

33:44

1917 namely speaking uh not about Palestine as as a whole uh but uh a some

33:55

sort of Pres in Palestine uh on behalf of the Jews uh

34:02

which is quite

34:24

different the national home

34:33

the committed zionists wanted to ensure the Declaration was clear that the whole of historic Palestine would be a

34:41

national Homeland exclusively for the Jewish

34:46

people the latest draft was sent to Kim vitman who in turn sent it to the

34:52

Zionist movement in the United States for their feedback

34:57

uh there was some consultation here during the summer of

35:03

1917 uh with the United States and and the early drafts that uh had had the

35:10

imprint of the Zionist uh uh elements in Britain um would have referred to

35:18

Palestine uh in its entirety as being uh for some sort of Jewish entity and those

35:25

elements event were modified before the drafting was

35:31

finalized another key part of the terminology that emerged in part of the drafting was in some British redrafting

35:39

where instead of for the Jewish people it was written the Jewish race now eventually this was taken out but I

35:45

think it’s very revealing that British officials wanted to use this kind of terminology because

35:52

after all this was how they understood the Jews of the world as being a racial group one that welded tremendous power

35:59

and also could be inspired altogether as one unit behind the cause of Zionism

36:04

supported by Britain and the Allies it’s striking that the existing Arab people in the region were not named at all

36:12

they’re simply called the quote existing non-jewish communities in [Music]

36:25

Palestine

36:40

[Music] [Applause] by October

36:46

1917 the final draft of the balur Declaration was ready awaiting only

36:51

British government final approval

36:57

there was a rumor that Germany was about to issue a similar declaration supporting the rights of the Jews in

37:04

Palestine when balur heard he rushed to get his final draft discussed at the

37:09

cabinet meeting on the 31st of October

37:16

1917 so when we think about the centinary of the Bala decoration everyone considers 2nd of November 1917

37:24

as the moment of the Declaration itself but it was actually agreed to by the British cabinet on the 31st of October

37:31

and this was a hugely significant meeting and in the minutes of that meeting balfor uh reiterates the

37:38

principal reasons for supporting Zionism and highlights its expected propaganda

37:44

effects uh amongst Jews around the world particularly in the United States and in

37:50

Russia the argument was was put forward most strongly by Lord balfor at the

37:55

meeting of October 31st uh and what he argued was that

38:01

issuing this declaration would be extremely helpful for the British uh in

38:08

solidifying the support of the United States uh and also encountering uh

38:15

propaganda from Germany the critical thing to remember about British diplomatic pronouncements is that what

38:21

one individual says does not represent the views of the government as a whole and you will find many different points

38:26

of view among British officials in the Years 1917 1918 and right into the early years of the Mandate but the British

38:33

were very clear that they had not promised statehood to the Zionist movement they had no interest in doing

38:39

so the British did not support Jewish nationalism they did not support Arab nationalism they supported British

38:45

imperialism but this is also the meeting where uh Lord Ken who was a member of the war cabinet

38:53

disqui about the possible effects of supporting cism on the Palestinian Arab

38:59

population and the Palestinian opposition is completely disregarded Lord kuren wrote a paper to

39:06

the cabinet asking what was quote to become of the people of this

39:12

country there were over half a million Syrian Arabs a mixed Community with Arab

39:18

Hebrew Canaanite Greek Egyptian and possibly Crusaders blood they and their

39:24

forefathers have occupied the country for the best part of 1, 1500 years they

39:29

own the soil they profess the muhammadan faith they will not be content either to

39:35

be expropriated for Jewish immigrants or to act merely as hewers of wood and

39:40

drawers of water to the latter but his precient remarks fell on

39:46

deaf ears it’s Sykes who tells Heim bitman at the end of the war cabinets

39:51

meeting Dr vitman it’s a boy as though they’ve witnessed the birth of an agreement to create a Jewish National

39:59

home as a baby in the Middle

40:05

East the final draft of the balford Declaration was 67 words

40:12

long his Majesty’s government view with favor The Establishment in Palestine of

40:18

a national home for the Jewish people and will use their best Endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this

40:25

object it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may Prejudice the civil and religious rights

40:32

of existing non-jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political

40:37

status enjoyed by Jews in any other country I should be grateful if you

40:42

would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation yours sincerely Arthur James

40:51

[Music] balur

40:56

well in terms of international law it really has very little standing in international law you know treaties

41:03

between nations have significance um uh but governments often issue policy

41:10

statements statements of intention about what they plan to do uh and those really

41:17

don’t have any standing as uh as a matter of of law uh for Britain this was

41:26

uh I suppose you would say a statement of its intention as to what it would do if

41:32

it were to take over Palestine which of course it it had not yet done as of

41:38

November

41:55

1917

42:00

two years after the Declaration a church leader in Jerusalem wrote to British prime minister Lloyd George about Jews

42:07

in Palestine trying to control holy sites Lloyd George’s office had said

42:14

that Kim vitman didn’t want to do anything affecting the rights of Arabs

42:20

it said he simply wanted to be involved in a council to help provide Refuge to Jews fleeing Russia and Eastern

42:28

Europe This exchange suggested that Britain felt it had not promised a Jewish state but simply a place for them

42:35

to live alongside Arabs when the League of Nations set out the British mandate in Palestine in

42:42

1923 it made Britain responsible for implementing the balur

42:48

Declaration as a result Jewish immigration to Palestine increased as

42:53

did Arab opposition to it expressed in a series of Palestinian protests against

42:59

Britain in the 1920s they understood the people of Palestine to be Muslims and Christians

43:05

but did not imagine that they would constitute a national community that would seek National Independence and

43:11

after the war very quickly when it becomes clear that Palestinian Arab nationalists are mobilizing against

43:19

sanism the British government are quick to see a major problem the Bal for

43:25

declaration had put in train a series of events that began to Signal its deep

43:30

flaws Arab descent built to the 3E Revolt between 1936 and

43:37

1939 it was a nationalist Uprising against the British Administration demanding Arab Independence and the end

43:44

of Jewish immigration it was in the peel Commission of 1937 that the British first recognized that instead of

43:51

balancing communities they had set in motion a rivalry between incompatible National movements

43:59

Jewish and Palestinian Arab and it was at that point that they tried to solv the problem by dividing

44:06

Palestine into two states Arab and Jewish through a partition plan and I think there you have the first

44:12

recognition or admission from British officials of the failure of the balur Declaration in May

44:18

1939 the British government published a policy document on Palestine called a

44:24

white paper it abandoned the partitioning of Palestine into two states and called instead for an

44:30

independent Palestine in which Arabs and Jews would share government it limited Jewish immigration

44:36

to 75,000 for 5 years and said that the Arab majority should determine future

44:42

immigration levels it also said that balur had not meant to create a Jewish State at the

44:49

expense of the Arabs any more than the McMan Hussein correspondence 24 years

44:54

before had promised promised an Arab state to Sharif Hussein of Mecca but the white paper met opposition

45:02

and was dropped the British government are quick

45:09

to see a major problem but there’s no way that they can back away from support for Zionism because this becomes the

45:15

basis for their justification for being in the holy land their commitment to supporting the movement in the Baler

45:21

declaration which becomes enshrined in international law in the terms of the Mandate for

45:27

Palestine so the British are stuck with Zionism they didn’t believe that

45:32

zionists wanted independent Jewish statehood and after the war it became very clear that actually the vast

45:38

majority of zionists didn’t only want statehood they expected it I think if we’re trying to assess

45:45

whether or not Britain’s policy towards Zionism in the first world war served British interests or not the first thing

45:52

we have to appreciate is the key reason that they supported sanism was based on an incorrect idea they believed that

46:00

they could mobilize something that they saw as Jewish power Around the World Behind the Allied cuse so first of all

46:07

that was entirely wrong and didn’t happen because this idea of Jewish power is fake is

46:14

[Music] false in September

46:19

1939 German expansionism led to the second world war over 60 million people

46:25

died including between 5 and 6 million Jews the majority in Nazi concentration

46:33

camps the British mandate ended at midnight on the 14th of May

46:38

1948 and immediately the formation of the state of Israel was announced justified by the terms of the

46:46

balur Declaration issued 31 years before while Israelis celebrated the

46:53

birth of their Nation 700,000 Palestinians were forced into camps and

46:59

[Music]

47:09

exile for Palestinians the bfor Declaration represents the moment and

47:14

Imperial power promised their land away to another people this is the desk where the Bala

47:22

decoration was composed it is that’s that’s they hold balur responsible for their

47:28

expulsion displacement and

47:39

[Music]

47:45

occupation

oooooo

ooo

Creation of Israel – COLD WAR DOCUMENTARY

(Bideoa: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reaL6tgDUXw)

Our series on the history of the Cold War period continues with a documentary on the creation of Israel, Zionist movement, reactions and diplomatic maneuvers of other states and the build-up to first Arab-Israeli war

Une nagusiak

2:06

British Opposition to Jewish Migraion to Palestine

3:40

Vote of the Partition Plan

13;05

Transkripzioa:

0:00

The idea of a state for the Jewish people had begun to gain traction by the end of the

0:05

First World War. This was formalized by the 1917 Balfour Declaration from the British

0:10

government, which proclaimed the intention of the “establishment in Palestine of a

0:16

national home for the Jewish people”. I’m your host David and today we will be talking

0:21

about the creation of the State of Israel. This is…The Cold War.

0:32

Although the British troops occupied Palestine in 1918 following the campaign against the

0:37

Ottomans, the League of Nations made this annexation legitimate in 1922 by granting

0:42

the mandate over the Palestine to Britain. The mandate included provisions calling for

0:48

the establishment of a Jewish homeland, facilitating Jewish immigration and encouraging Jewish

0:53

settlement on the land. Of course, as you might already know, the Arab population of

0:59

Palestine was opposed to the increase in Jewish immigration and settlement. This became the

1:04

source of a great deal of conflict and confrontation prior to the outbreak of the Second World

1:10

War, which the British were unable to stop. Over a quarter of a million Jews arrived in

1:16

Palestine between 1929 and 1938, and despite the efforts of the British to prevent this

1:23

immigration, the Jewish Agency as well as other Jewish organizations continued to help

1:28

smuggle Jews into Palestine. In the Palestinian mandate, armed Jewish organizations were fighting

1:35

against both Arab groups and the British administration. Their goal was to ensure continued Jewish

1:41

immigration and ultimately, independence. If you are wondering why immigration was considered

1:47

so vital to the Jewish community, you just need to recall that the persecution of Jews

1:53

across much of Europe was widespread in the pre-war years, with many nations unwilling

1:59

to accept Jewish refugees. The idea of a partition in Palestine was first

2:05

presented by the British Peel Commission, in 1937, after it became clear that there

2:10

was little chance of achieving order in Palestine. The Peel Commission proposed the creation

2:16

of two seperate states, one Arab and one Jewish, with population transfers happening to adjust

2:23

ethnic divides. The Jewish community was in favour of this proposal, seeing it as a first

2:28

step in the creation of a Jewish homeland but the Arab community opposed it as they

2:33

did not want to lose the land. The other prominent proposal made by the British

2:39

Government in the pre-Second World War era was the White Paper, published in 1939. It

2:45

called for the establishment of a Jewish national home inside of an independent Palestine within

2:52

the next 10 years. It also put a limit on Jewish immigration to a maximum of seventy-five

2:58

thousand people over five years and finally, it placed restrictions on the Jewish population

3:04

from buying more in Palestine. While the more moderate groups in the Arab

3:11

community were willing to accept this proposal, under pressure from the conservative and nationalist

3:16

Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Mohammed Amin al-Husseini, it was eventually rejected. The Zionist groups

3:24

in the Jewish community were also against the White paper as it did not promise an independent

3:29

state for the Jews and also imposed restrictions to immigration. The rejection led to further

3:36

animosity between the Jewish community in Palestine and the British administration.

3:42

British opposition to Jewish migration to Palestine, still in line with the White Paper,

3:47

continued in 1945, after the end of the War. US President Truman asked Great Britain to

3:53

admit one hundred thousand survivors of the Holocaust which was subsequently rejected.

4:00

The presence of a very strong US Jewish political lobby, as well as favourable (some would very

4:08

much say guilty) public opinion towards the Jewish community in the wake of the Holocaust

4:13

caused the US to put a great deal of pressure on Britain to change their stance. Britain,

4:20

financially dependant on the United States for the rebuilding of their country, was in

4:24

a very difficult position. 1946 saw the the British yield somewhat with

4:30

the creation of the Anglo-American Committee, focused on the issues of immigration of European

4:35

Jews to Palestine but also pointedly ignored the issue of creating an independent Jewish

4:41

state. The plan was to deal with the pressing humanitarian issue and to leave the statehood

4:48

issue alone so as to avoid conflict with the Arab communities, both in Palestine as well

4:54

in the region overall. By April of 1946, the Committee had reached the unanimous decision

5:00

for the immediate admission of one hundred thousand Jewish refugees from Europe in Palestine

5:05

and well as to remove the White Paper restrictions on the purchase of land by Jews.

5:12

So how well was this received by both sides? If you guessed “Not Well” you would be

5:18

correct! The Arabs were not happy with the influx of more Jewish refugees who would continue

5:24

to take land and resources. There were even calls in the Arab World for Jihad and for

5:29

the Jews to be “removed”, which in this case translated to mean “annihilated”.

5:36

The Jewish community on the other hand, didn’t like the proposal as it ignored the call for

5:41

a Jewish state to be created. There were claims that it was an attempt to quote-unquote “clip

5:47

the wings of political zionism by treating the whole matter as a Jewish refugee problem.”.

5:52

So yeah, the Commission’s proposal was rejected by both sides.

5:59

While all this was going on, there were armed Jewish underground organizations such as the

6:04

Haganah, Irgun and Stern Gang who were waging a guerrilla war against the British administration

6:10

in Palestine. This guerilla war was only intensifying the longer a settlement failed to be achieved.

6:18

The British responded, with the not-so-subtle Operation Agatha; the arrest of approximately

6:23

two thousand seven hundred Jewish activists. This was done to disrupt Jewish paramilitary

6:29

operations by seizing weapons and removing leadership. On the 21st of July 1946, the

6:35

British Military Headquarters, based in the King David Hotel in Jerusalem was bombed by

6:41

Irgun, resulting in 91 deaths. In response to THIS, over one hundred twenty thousand

6:48

Jews were summoned and interrogated by the Police. This was almost one out of every five

6:54

Jews in Palestine. The heavy-handed response of the British and

6:58

their inability to find a compromise, as well as the escalating violence did not play well

7:04

in the United States. The Americans put pressure on Britain and effectively forced them to

7:09

refer the matter to the United Nations. In May of 1947, the United Nations formed

7:15

a Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP), tasked with preparing recommendations for

7:20

the future of Palestine including how it should be governed as well as how to handle the Jewish

7:25

population in the Mandate. The Committee was composed of the so-called neutral states of

7:31

Australia, Netherlands, Iran, Sweden, India, Peru, Czechoslovakia, Guatemala, Uruguay,

7:38

and Yugoslavia. As you can probably guess, not all of these countries were really and

7:43

truly neutral. While the Jewish Agency cooperated with the

7:48

committee, the Arab leadership in Palestine boycotted any participation, claiming that

7:53

the committee was “pro-zionist”. The Committee representatives, in the course

8:02

of their considerations, carried out field trips to meet with Jewish representatives

8:06

in Palestine as well as with Arab leadership both inside Palestine as well as in other

8:12

countries in the region. They also spent time monitoring the attempts of Jewish people attempting

8:18

to illegally immigrate into Palestine as well as meeting with Jewish refugees who were still

8:24

in various holding camps across Europe. The Committee, as I’m sure you could expect,

8:30

was heavily lobbied by representatives from all sides; Jewish, Arab, and even the British.

8:37

Jewish groups wanted a partition of Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states. The

8:43

Arabs lobbied against this outcome, warning that a divided Palestine could lead to catastrophe

8:48

in the region. The British, on the other hand lobbied in favour of Partition as the only

8:53

feasible option. On September 3, 1947, the United Nations Special

8:58

Committee on Palestine published its report. It proposed the establishment of two separate

9:04

nations, one Arab and one Jewish, but that would retain an economic union. Jerusalem

9:10

would be governed by the international community. The proposal was sent to the United Nations

9:15

General Assembly to be voted on. Notably, both the United States and the Soviet Union

9:20

were in favour of the proposal for partition. How did the newly emerged Superpowers view

9:27

this proposal and how did they react to it? Pro-Zionist movements in the United States

9:32

had launched an intense lobbying campaign to secure public support for the plan and

9:37

to encourage the US government to apply pressure on other countries to also back the proposal.

9:43

President Truman, not personally happy with the lobbying taking place, still put his support

9:48

behind the plan, mostly as a result of electoral considerations with a Presidential Election

9:54

approaching. A formal endorsement was given on October 11, 1947 and was followed by a

10:01

statement, signed by 26 of the US Senators who wielded influence on foreign aid bills,

10:07

calling on other states to support the plan. Nobody should be surprised that the United

10:12

States, who was so busy financing the reconstruction of a war-torn world, was using its financial

10:18

muscle to get countries to do what it wanted. It is reported that at least France, Haiti,

10:25

the Philippines and Liberia voted in favour of the UN partition plan based on financial

10:30

pressure from the US. Ok, so now we know why and how the Americans

10:36

were in favour of the Partition of Palestine. So why were the Soviets?

10:41

While official Soviet ideology was critical of Zionism, describing it as bourgeois nationalism,

10:47

Stalin, forever the calculating pragmatist, chose not to see this matter through the lens

10:52

of ideology but rather as someone looking for the best geopolitical outcome for his

10:57

country! The Soviet leadership saw the Arab countries as being pro-British and hoped that

11:03

the creation of a Jewish state in the region would disrupt British dominance. Stalin also

11:09

hoped that the future Jewish state would be Socialist in nature and align itself with

11:14

the Soviet Union. With this in mind, Moscow pushed its socialist

11:19

allies to support the partition plan in the UN General Assembly. As the plan required

11:24

a two-thirds majority vote to succeed, the support of the Moscow-led socialist countries

11:28

was crucial. Andrei Gromyko, now the Soviet Ambassador to the UN made an impassioned speech

11:35

before the vote was held, calling for an independent Jewish state. He called back to the immense

11:41

suffering that the Jewish people had endured through the Holocaust in order to justify

11:45

Soviet support. As a side note, Soviet support for the Jewish

11:50

state continued, even after the declaration of independence of Israel, and many of the

11:55

weapons used by the Israelis in the First Arab-Israeli War originated from the Skoda

11:59

factories in Czechoslovakia, sold to the Jewish state under Soviet auspices. We are going

12:05

to cover more about this conflict in upcoming episodes so make sure to check it out!

12:10

So this all looks pretty favourable for the Jewish community in Palestine. But how did

12:15

the Arabs feel about all this? This was, after all, their land. As I’m sure you already

12:21

know, or at least can guess, they were diametrically opposed. Arab leaders applied pressure of

12:28

their own in the international community to vote against the plan. The Iraqi Prime Minister

12:33

warned, using very harsh words, that recognition of the plan would lead to a revolt by the

12:38

Arabs of not only Palestine but in other nations as well, and would create a great danger to

12:45

the Jewish communities across the entire region. The head of the Egyptian delegation in the

12:51

General Assembly echoed these warnings, warning of inevitable bloodshed and danger to a million

12:57

Jews living in the Arab countries. In our next episode, we will talk more about the

13:03

Arab countries in this period. The vote on the partition plan was held in

13:08

United Nations General Assembly on the 27th of November, 1947. Thirty-three countries,

13:15

including the United States and the Soviet Union voted in favour while only 13, almost

13:21

all Muslim-majority countries, voted against the plan. The plan for the partition of Palestine

13:27

into a Jewish state and an Arab state was passed through the United Nations.

13:33

This marked the first major test of the UN of an extremely complicated matter, which

13:38

was never going to have an easy solution that could bring satisfaction to all sides. The

13:43

success of the proposed plan was dependent on the support of both the Soviet Union and

13:48

the United States, even if this support was the result of very different reasons. It is

13:54

one of the early examples of the two Superpowers using the UN as a place to flex their international

13:59

muscle over other countries instead of letting it be an impartial judge of international

14:05

conflicts. So this is the background on how the State

14:09

of Israel was to be formed but certainly not at all where the story ends. We here at the

14:15

Cold War will discuss what happens next in our future videos, so make sure you are subscribed

14:20

to our channel and have pressed the bell button. We rely on our patrons to create these videos,

14:27

so consider supporting us via www.patreon.com/thecoldwar. This the Cold War channel and we will catch

14:35

you on the next one.

oooooo

C Nguyen@CNguyenEc

It’s finally out, by two deeply empathetic historians. “The Great Transformation: China’s Road from Revolution to Reform” (2024).

Irudia

oooooo

We Basques do need a real Basque independent State in the Western Pyrenees, just a democratic lay or secular state, wth all the formal chracteristics of any independent State: Central Bank, Treasury, proper currency, out of the European Distopia and faraway from NAT0, maybe being a BRICS partner…

Ikus The self-financing state: an institutional analysis of government expenditure, revenue collection and debt issuance operations in the United Kingdom (file:///C:/Users/Joseba/Downloads/ssrn-4890683.pdf)

Hona hemen gehigarri adierazgarri batzuk:

Eurozone Dystopia

Neoliberala al zara?

Aspaldi honetan, NATO dela kausa, “Europar Distopia versus Europa (EFTA, kasu)” delakoaren ordez, hauxe proposatzen dut: BRICS delakoan sartzea, EFTA-tik BRICS-era

Independentzia! Besterik ez!

INDEPENDENTZIA!

Euskal Herria: independentzia (2024)

Poiesisa, poesia, sormena: Independentzia

Gehigarri orokorra:

ooooooo

MMT: Modern Monetary Theory

Understanding how money works so that we can address climate change easily and prosperously plus address AI’s impact on humanity.

Members: https://x.com/i/communities/1672597800385921024/members

(…)

 

 

 

 

 

 

@tobararbulu # mmt

@tobararbulu

oooooo


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 314

Trending Articles


Euskalgintza bidegurutzean


Serio jolastu beharreko jolasa dugu bizitza


Euskal Herria Heterodoxiatik