Azken bolada honetan ikusi dugunez (Israel, AEB eta NATO zale estatu guztiak errudun, Palestinaren genozidioan izeneko sarreretan), onik, deus gutxi espero daiteke NATO-ko estatu kide guztietatik…
Guk GAZA segituko dugu aipatzen.
oooooo
Segida
Over 2 million people are still trapped here. There is no way out for them.
Bombing continues day and night.
They are deprived of food, water, and healthcare.
Please keep talking about Palestine.
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1867985069354463583
oooooo
Injured Civilians, Including Children, Taken to Hospital After
Israel’s Bombardment in Jabalia Israel’s bombardment targeting families in Gaza’s Jabalia, which began overnight and continued into the morning, has left many injured, including children, who are being taken to the hospital.
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1867849135962906959
oooooo
Protestors outside Parliament today saying:
Not in our name.
It’s a genocide.
You Keir Starmer 
are complicit.
Stop selling arms to Israel 
today
Recognise Palestine 
today.
oooooo
HOW GEORGE SOROS OVERTHREW DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED GOVT IN UKRAINE 
The Western media won’t tell you this story (
1/6)
Melanie Schweizer@Melaniebelizi
Never in my life will I understand how one can be silent in the midst of the utmost horror
against children: Silent or even justifying this. We have a duty to protect children – all children, everywhere, every one of us. This is the base of life, isn’t it? What have we become?
oooooo
After a year of campaigning across Ireland, every Lidl in Ireland is now free of products made in Israel! Activists from every corner of the land regularly visited the retailer’s outlets, distributing leaflets and informing people.
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1867841289175073068
BLINKEN WILL BE KNOWN AS THE BUTCHER OF GAZA
Bdeoa: https://x.com/i/status/1867834156480188637
oooooo
Well done, Australia. 
oooooo
Gaza resists. That’s why the US-backed Israeli entity keep bombing its people on a daily basis, in order to make its government bow like its neighbors’
oooooo
BRAVE German MP Destroys NATO Lies Publicly! | Sevim Dagdelen
ooo
BRAVE German MP Destroys NATO Lies Publicly! | Sevim Dagdelen
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eT3HtG_LKjg)
[Part 1 of 2] In her latest book, Sevim Dagdelen, a member of the Bundestag (German Parliament) not only dispels the myths of NATO but also explains why Germany needs more “courage for neutrality” to resist Washington’s dictates and pursue an independent foreign policy that is focused on Germany’s welfare. The war in Ukraine must be ended as quickly as possible through negotiations, not prolonged with more weapons and further escalation. The desire of the warmongers to spread this tragedy across all of Europe must be stopped!
Transkripzioa:
0:04
unfortunately many other parties and
0:06
politicians have obviously completely
0:08
lost a fundamental characteristic of our
0:10
basic law namely the peace mandate that
0:13
is enshrined in our
0:15
constitution this peace mandate emerged
0:17
after World War II primarily because
0:19
Germany was meant to be a peace power
0:22
Germany was supposed to be perceived
0:23
worldwide as a peace actor War should
0:26
never again emanate from German soil and
0:29
War weapon orts should never again come
0:31
from German soil with which Wars and
0:34
human rights violations are committed as
0:36
is currently the case in Gaza by Israel
0:39
also with the help of German arms
0:42
exports all this actually mandates being
0:44
neutral and advocating for an
0:46
independent Sovereign foreign and
0:48
security policy based on the interests
0:50
of democratic sovereignty and the
0:52
majority of the population and not of
0:55
any corporations or the military
0:57
industrial complex
1:00
milit indust
1:02
[Music]
1:11
complex hello everyone here I am once
1:14
again speaking in German because today I
1:16
have the great pleasure and honor of
1:18
speaking with one of Germany’s most
1:19
famous and Powerful
1:22
parliamentarians I have with me Miss
1:24
seim dardan who has represented her
1:27
constituency of North Rin West failure
1:28
in the bundestag since 2005 formerly for
1:32
the party Dinka and for the past few
1:34
months for the newly founded party bnes
1:36
Sarah
1:38
varen incidentally Miss dellan is also
1:42
the spokesperson for foreign policy for
1:44
the new party recently Miss dardan also
1:47
released a great book titled NATO a
1:50
Reckoning with the alliance of values
1:53
you can imagine how much joy this
1:54
reading has brought me today we want to
1:57
talk about her critique and Analysis of
1:59
NATO Miss Dellin welcome to neutrality
2:02
studiesin has of neutrality studies yeah
2:06
yes thank you very much for the
2:11
invitation well miss dellan you
2:14
beautifully write at the end of your
2:15
book that the pursuit of alternatives to
2:18
Nato is resistance against a World War
2:20
policy we need peace instead of NATO why
2:24
did you write this NATO critical book
2:26
now and could you briefly present the
2:28
main thesis of the book
2:38
yes very gladly so why I wrote it we are
2:42
witnessing a NATO that seems to be at
2:44
the peak of its power namely on its 75th
2:46
Anniversary it relies on escalation when
2:48
you analyze what NATO is
2:50
doing keyword proxy war against Russia
2:54
in Ukraine complicity with Israel in
2:56
this murderous war in the Gaza Strip
2:58
against the Palestinian population
3:00
or the expansion towards Asia with a
3:02
global claim to power far removed from a
3:04
territorial restriction to the North
3:06
Atlantic
3:10
[Music]
3:14
are and we must acknowledge that this
3:17
NATO which was completely renewed after
3:19
the cold war is dangerous and is pushing
3:21
us to the brink of a third world war
3:23
like never before we can also see this
3:25
in the current debates for this policy
3:28
of escalation an expansion NATO needs
3:32
myths Legends and fairy
3:34
tales the great myths of NATO are that
3:37
it is a defensive Alliance an alliance
3:39
of democracies and rule of law and an
3:41
alliance for the respect of Human Rights
3:43
and
3:46
[Music]
3:52
values and I believe that the
3:54
prerequisite for seeing reality is to
3:56
deal with these myths to put the myths
3:59
to the test
4:00
this is the prerequisite for having a
4:02
realistic view of the military pact
4:04
which is nothing more than a war pact
4:07
consequently we must initiate the Urgent
4:09
discussion what do we need instead we
4:12
need peace instead of NATO how can we
4:15
establish peace and common Security in
4:17
the world this book is intended to serve
4:19
that purpose it offers a realistic
4:21
assessment and Analysis of NATO why was
4:24
it founded what are the big myths what
4:26
drives NATO and then of course the leap
4:28
to Asia the expansion of NATO and
4:31
finally the
4:39
Outlook NATO is constantly expanding but
4:43
one place it hasn’t expanded is Russia
4:45
we know that Russia has knocked more
4:47
than once and asked if it could join
4:49
when the Cold War ended how do you
4:52
explain that NATO seems to constantly
4:53
need an enemy
5:04
and one simply has to look at the
5:06
founding of NATO NATO was founded in
5:08
1949 by 12 States led by the USA the
5:12
predecessor of this North Atlantic
5:14
Treaty was the OAS treaty the Treaty of
5:16
the organization of American states from
5:19
the very beginning especially during the
5:21
founding phase During the period a
5:24
period of systemic confrontation with
5:26
the Soviet Union it was essentially
5:28
always about establishing a Pax
5:30
Americana that is creating an exclusive
5:33
sphere of influence for the USA this
5:35
actually stands in contradiction to
5:37
Russia as the successor state of the
5:39
Soviet Union after the end of the Cold
5:42
War the European States together with
5:45
Canada and the USA contractually
5:47
committed themselves in the charter of
5:49
Paris to establish a common peace and
5:51
security order a common comprehensive
5:54
and inclusive house in Europe
6:04
but instead of establishing this common
6:06
peace and security order further
6:08
confrontations and escalations were
6:11
provoked contrary to promises not to
6:13
expand an inch not a centimeter to the
6:15
east the military Alliance has advanced
6:18
its expansion to the borders of Russia
6:20
Today NATO as in 1949 serves as an
6:23
instrument of the unchallenged leading
6:25
power the USA to enforce pursue promote
6:28
and Safeguard it strategic and security
6:31
interests that was the intention from
6:33
the beginning I’m talking about Pax
6:36
Americana an exclusive sphere of
6:38
influence of the USA it remains so to
6:40
this day and NATO is still intended to
6:43
serve to maintain the USA as the world
6:45
hegemon therefore deterrence Armament
6:48
and confrontation are relied upon
7:00
anyone who argues like you and I argue
7:02
the same way is usually accused of being
7:05
Putin puppets Pro Russian or Borton paid
7:07
for and that we are getting money for it
7:10
how do you explain this narrative
7:12
especially in Germany it is extremely
7:15
strong is it really as Mr stoltenberg
7:17
once said that weapons are the way to
7:19
peace and no one notices that this is
7:22
madness why do so few people in Germany
7:24
noticed this
7:35
yes I also address this in my book
7:37
particularly in a chapter about
7:38
disinformation and NATO’s cognitive
7:41
Warfare It’s about how NATO aims to win
7:43
Wars not only on the battlefield but
7:45
also in people’s minds propaganda plays
7:48
an important role in this if you talk to
7:50
a three or four-year-old child they will
7:52
logically respond that weapons do not
7:55
bring peace weapons lead to more death
7:58
more destruction and fuel
8:07
Wars and that is the opposite of Peace
8:10
therefore it is all the more necessary
8:12
to conduct propaganda that explains to
8:14
people that war is the same as peace and
8:17
that weapons are diplomatic peace tools
8:20
instead of saying that they are murder
8:23
tools we know this like in a
8:26
totalitarian state the opposition is
8:28
fought by the mream media by suspecting
8:31
them of collaborating With the Enemy
8:32
there are many journalists in Germany
8:34
who now label anyone who is even
8:36
remotely against sending weapons into an
8:38
ongoing war and instead advocates for
8:41
negotiations as Putin friends Kremlin
8:43
agents or
8:53
similar and I think this is very
8:55
transparent propaganda that this is
8:57
always a part of War propaganda is is
8:59
known from the 1920s and 1930s of the
9:02
last century back then people who
9:05
opposed the first world war were also
9:07
defamed it was about countering the
9:09
supposed Social Democratic left
9:11
narrative they claimed that one had to
9:13
stand up against the barbarism of
9:15
tsarism in Russia
9:18
Today the Russian president is equated
9:21
with Hitler to silence or denounce any
9:23
criticism we really know this from
9:25
history and one should not be
9:27
intimidated by it
9:33
[Music]
9:36
it is clear that these parties and
9:39
partly the mainstream press are pushing
9:40
for another War for an escalation for
9:43
direct German involvement in the war
9:45
against Russia and we should not let
9:48
this drive us crazy we will be proven
9:50
right just as we were for example for 20
9:53
years in the war against
9:55
Afghanistan when the war against
9:57
Afghanistan started there was again a
9:58
barrage propaganda of War propaganda it
10:02
was about the barbarity of the Taliban
10:04
it was about building Wells it was about
10:06
sending girls back to school it was
10:09
about defending Germany’s security and
10:10
freedom in the Hindu Kush and when we
10:13
said over 20 years ago that this war was
10:15
wrong we were proven right you cannot
10:19
win a war against
10:27
Terror you cannot win a war against
10:30
Terror it is completely absurd and
10:32
contemptible to want to export democracy
10:35
to other countries against the will of
10:37
the
10:37
population they have made us
10:39
contemptible by claiming that we would
10:41
side with the Taliban and are not
10:43
humanitarians they say we are against
10:46
humanitarian
10:47
interventions I think one should really
10:49
not be
10:50
intimidated peace still means the
10:53
absence of War weapons and instruments
10:55
of murder Wars are promoted by arms
10:57
exports and arms deliveries not by
10:59
diplomatic negotiations which we
11:01
advocate in this respect we should not
11:04
be deterred but insist that we want to
11:06
create peace without
11:16
weapons how did you personally manage
11:18
not to get drawn into this Vortex we
11:21
have seen it with the greens and the SPD
11:23
who were actually once against NATO
11:25
today I slowly get the feeling that the
11:28
greenest thing about the greens is still
11:30
the color of the uniform but even that
11:32
has become quite dark olive green how is
11:36
it with you you are first with the left
11:38
and are now with the alliance SAR
11:41
vagen how many people in the bundestag
11:43
are against this war policy of the
11:53
majority well one must say from the
11:55
party’s perspective there is only the
11:57
Sarah wagon connect Alliance that is is
11:59
consistently against this toxic mix of
12:01
arms deliveries and economic Warfare
12:04
through sanctions it advocates for an
12:06
unconditional ceasefire whether in Gaza
12:09
or in Ukraine and for negotiations
12:12
compromise Solutions and diplomatic
12:14
Solutions we are truly the only ones in
12:17
this regard because it also goes hand
12:20
inand with social
12:28
cutbacks so the entire rearmament policy
12:30
and the proxy wars of NATO primarily
12:33
serve to enforce the interests of the
12:35
USA one could use the term client states
12:38
from the Roman Empire which fight these
12:40
wars for the USA these wars are of
12:43
course also directed Inward and are
12:45
accompanied by Massive Cuts in the
12:46
social sector I would like to mention
12:49
another example besides Germany Italy
12:52
there there was a real wage loss of 3.6
12:54
to 3.8% in the Years 2022 and 2023 by 2
12:59
.1% unemployed individuals single
13:02
unemployed individuals and young people
13:04
up to the age of 59 have now experienced
13:07
Cuts in social assistance
13:15
[Music]
13:17
there you only receive around 250 or 350
13:22
instead of
13:23
780 and that only for 12 months the
13:26
entire rearmament policy in Europe is
13:28
fin financed with war credits this
13:31
results in budget deficits that are
13:32
tackled with cuts in the social sector
13:35
the health sector and the education
13:37
sector just like in Germany the only
13:39
alliance against this toxic mix is Sarah
13:41
vagen kns we have the afd on the right
13:45
side of the Arena presenting itself as a
13:47
peace party but the afd is not against
13:50
rearmament quite the opposite the afd is
13:52
a party for militarism and for Capital
14:01
you support the 100 billion Euro special
14:04
debt for the bundes fair and have said
14:05
that it is even too little for you it
14:08
could be significantly more you support
14:11
that Germany last year allocated 90
14:13
billion EUR for Armament and Military
14:16
over 2% of the gross domestic product
14:19
and actually wants to spend even
14:21
more you support NATO as a military
14:24
Alliance you also supported in the vote
14:27
that that NATO was expanded to to
14:29
include Sweden and Finland which I
14:31
consider a fatal mistake the northern
14:33
expansion as well as the Eastern
14:35
expansion before that the afd supported
14:37
this and unlike us is not only not
14:40
against rearmament and militarization
14:42
but also has no problems with social
14:49
[Music]
14:51
Cuts she is against a statutory minimum
14:54
wage the increase of the minimum wage
14:56
and social housing construction however
14:59
there are here and there members of
15:00
parliament in various factions be it the
15:02
CDU CSU faction or the SPD who recognize
15:06
this madness but they usually do not
15:09
dare to publicly stand against it
15:11
against the faction line or the party
15:12
line which I find very
15:15
regrettable we need every voice against
15:17
the war and against Germany’s or NATO’s
15:20
direct involvement in this proxy war in
15:22
Ukraine which holds enormous escalation
15:26
potential an enormous escal
15:33
and we will talk about that in a moment
15:36
but I would like to return to something
15:37
you mentioned in the conclusion of your
15:39
book which pleases me the most also in
15:42
relation to the name of my channel you
15:45
write that Europe must return to
15:47
diplomacy and international law and most
15:49
importantly have the courage to embrace
15:52
neutrality could you elaborate on that
15:56
how do you see neutrality as part of
15:58
Europe’s future
16:07
one might first need to say that members
16:09
of NATO engage in a trade-off as soon as
16:12
one becomes a member of this military
16:14
pact one loses independent autonomy and
16:17
also sovereignty this applies both to
16:19
foreign and security policy as well as
16:21
to domestic policy because they are
16:23
naturally
16:24
intertwined one essentially gives up
16:27
neutrality and I believe believe that
16:29
this means conversely that we need to
16:31
leave this military pact in order to be
16:33
neutral autonomous and independent again
16:36
and to regain sovereignty in our
16:38
politics whether domestically or in
16:40
foreign
16:49
policy and I believe that NATO members
16:51
are at risk of subordinating their
16:53
foreign and security policy to the
16:55
directives of Washington and giving up
16:58
their own democratic sovereignty this is
17:00
evident right now for example because US
17:02
President Biden declared overnight that
17:05
Western weapons especially American
17:07
weapons can be used in Ukraine for war
17:10
objectives in Russia shortly thereafter
17:13
Chancellor Olaf Schultz said that German
17:16
weapons can now also be
17:25
used so if one still needs proof that we
17:28
are essentially just a vassel state of
17:31
the USA and almost instantaneously
17:33
follow every step of the US
17:36
Administration then we have received
17:38
this proof once again today this is of
17:41
course dangerous for us therefore I say
17:44
we need an independent Europe of
17:45
sovereign democracies in a multipolar
17:48
world this includes an independent
17:50
European foreign and security policy
17:52
that is oriented towards good relations
17:54
with the major Powers it must also take
17:56
into account international law ta policy
17:59
and balancing of interests this requires
18:02
stopping the expansion of NATO into Asia
18:04
and
18:12
Europe of course one should
18:15
simultaneously pursue a policy of
18:17
disengagement as George F Kennan for
18:19
example advocated Kennan was a
18:22
significant foreign policy figure in the
18:24
USA the goal is to achieve a
18:26
disentanglement of military blocks and
18:28
to launch a diplomatic initiative to
18:30
reduce the risk of direct military
18:33
confrontation this is all important in
18:35
the past it has been observed that
18:37
countries adopting a neutral position
18:39
are protected from attacks they are not
18:42
perceived as aggressive states that
18:44
might attack and therefore do not run
18:47
the risk of being preemptively
18:56
attacked and this neutrality has
18:58
protected many countries such as
19:00
Switzerland for 200 years or Ireland but
19:04
this neutrality is naturally Under
19:05
Pressure the neutrality of Finland and
19:08
also Austria has protected them as well
19:11
both countries have historically
19:12
benefited from this neutrality such as
19:15
the withdrawal of Allied and Russian
19:17
troops from
19:18
Austria in Finland this neutrality has
19:21
also protected the country I believe it
19:24
is a mistake to think that Ireland can
19:25
achieve more security by joining a
19:27
military Pact
19:31
[Music]
19:37
I absolutely agree with you often the
19:39
counterargument is made that Belgium was
19:41
invaded and neutrality does not
19:44
work then I always have to say yes but
19:47
the other Allied states in the first
19:49
world war also ended up in the war
19:52
ultimately alliances have an extreme
19:54
potential to generate War if you had a
19:57
majority in the bundar tomorrow for an
19:59
alliance with Sarah Venn and you were
20:01
Chancellor would you take Germany out of
20:04
NATO and declare it
20:12
neutral well I would of course wish for
20:14
a federal republic of Germany that
20:16
remains
20:17
neutral we recently celebrated the 75th
20:20
anniversary of our great basic law on
20:22
May 23rd unfortunately many other
20:26
parties and politicians have completely
20:28
lost a fundamental characteristic of our
20:30
basic law namely the peace mandate that
20:33
is enshrined in our basic law this peace
20:36
mandate emerged after the second world
20:38
war because Germany was supposed to be a
20:40
peace power it was therefore supposed to
20:43
be perceived worldwide as a peace actor
20:45
War should never again emanate from
20:47
German
20:52
[Music]
20:55
soil and from German soil there should
20:58
never never again be exports of War
21:00
weapons with which Wars and human rights
21:02
violations are committed as is currently
21:05
the case in Gaza by Israel with the help
21:07
of German arms
21:09
exports all this actually demands that
21:12
we remain neutral and advocate for an
21:14
independent Sovereign foreign and
21:16
security policy based on the interests
21:19
of democratic sovereignty and the
21:20
majority of the population and not of
21:22
any corporations or the military
21:24
industrial complex whether in Germany or
21:27
the USA
21:28
is what I would wish for but it would of
21:30
course be illusory to say that such
21:32
ideals could be achieved immediately
21:43
tomorrow therefore concrete steps must
21:45
be taken we are taking these concrete
21:47
steps by relying on diplomacy both in
21:50
Gaza and in Ukraine we need an
21:52
unconditional ceasefire the dying must
21:55
be stopped and the risk of escalation
21:57
must be reduced
21:59
the second point is that we want to
22:00
return to international law NATO is not
22:03
an alliance that has respected
22:04
international law so far on the contrary
22:07
it leaves a trail of blood in NATO’s
22:09
history violations of international law
22:12
illegal Wars and war crimes characterize
22:15
NATO yes exactly that’s why I mean these
22:18
myths 25 years ago with the war of
22:21
aggression against Yugoslavia it was
22:23
proven that television stations and
22:25
infrastructure were bombed
22:33
even the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade was
22:35
bombed by NATO there was no
22:38
International legal authorization for
22:39
these
22:40
bombs 20 years of war in Afghanistan
22:43
were conducted with numerous war crimes
22:45
that remain unpunished to this day the
22:48
leading power of NATO the USA waged an
22:50
illegal war against Iraq with the help
22:53
of other Allied NATO States and NATO
22:55
infrastructure even countries like the
22:57
federal republic of Germany which did
22:59
not actively participate in this war
23:02
provided NATO infrastructure on German
23:04
soil and thus effectively supported
23:13
it and of course there is the war in
23:15
Libya in 2011 also the attack on Libya
23:18
in disregard or misuse of a UN
23:21
resolution for a regime change War by
23:23
NATO we have seen all of this and it is
23:26
not a defense Alliance according to the
23:29
American Brown University the NATO
23:31
leading power USA is responsible for the
23:33
death of 4.5 million people in the last
23:36
20 years in this war on terror if one
23:38
wants to end this one must of course
23:41
return to international law all states
23:43
must adhere to this if they do not want
23:45
to wake up in Anarchy or barbarism that
23:48
is the alternative to international law
23:50
to an international order that everyone
23:52
must follow
24:01
and we need Arms Control treaties again
24:04
we must return to disarmament it is
24:06
absurd and extremely dangerous to live
24:08
in a world where there are weapon
24:10
systems that can destroy the entire
24:12
planet multiple times and where there
24:14
are no longer any Arms Control
24:16
agreements that are adhered to and
24:18
mutually respected we need to return to
24:21
that and what we also need of course is
24:24
an end to economic Wars and unilateral
24:27
sanctions these sanctions are primarily
24:29
decided unilaterally and in violation of
24:32
international law by the West normally
24:34
under chapter 7 of the UN Charter the UN
24:37
Security Council alone is authorized to
24:39
impose
24:48
sanctions but the West the EU and NATO
24:50
simply decide on sanctions for
24:52
themselves or the USA decides on
24:55
them these sanctions are considered the
24:57
weapons of mass destruction of our time
25:00
thousands of people in Cuba Venezuela
25:02
and Syria suffer from these unilateral
25:04
sanctions not to mention the economic
25:07
Wars that bring us to the brink of
25:08
economic collapse even in the industrial
25:11
nations of
25:12
Europe for example the sanctions against
25:15
Russia this economic war or now the
25:17
economic war against China which is
25:19
particularly instigated by the USA 100%
25:22
tariffs on electric cars 50% on
25:24
semiconductors and solar cells 25% on
25:27
batteries and Port cranes
25:37
with these latest announcements from the
25:39
Biden Administration this trade war
25:41
between the USA and China is
25:44
intensifying this leads to Germany
25:46
getting caught in the crossfire
25:47
especially considering that China is our
25:49
largest trading partner we need to
25:52
return to regulations in arms control
25:55
and to cooperation in economic relations
25:57
we should move away from the escalation
26:00
of economic relations with Russia and
26:01
China and return to international law
26:04
and
26:04
diplomacy these would be essential steps
26:07
to deescalate the situation worldwide
26:09
and achieve a relaxation of tensions I
26:12
hope that when we celebrate the 75th
26:14
anniversary of NATO this year we won’t
26:16
have a 76th or 80th anniversary
26:27
[Music]
oooooo
They Are SERIOUSLY Preparing To Use NATO Against China! | German MP, Sev… https://youtu.be/hbeWLqI7saw?si=k3KqpRHbjqod6SJk
ooo
They Are SERIOUSLY Preparing To Use NATO Against China! | German MP, Sevim Dagdelen
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbeWLqI7saw)
[Part 2 of 2] Bad news for people who don’t like the idea of Word War 3: NATO is working on “going global” as the neocons are now setting sight on their next target: China.
At least there is still resistance in the Bundestag. This is the second part of an interview with Member of Parliament Sevim Dagdelen, who has been opposing warmongering for many years and would prefer to see NATO dissolved rather than expanded.
Transkripzioa:
0:02
and that is why I’m very concerned about
0:03
the upcoming NATO Summit in Washington
0:05
this July they want to usher in a new
0:08
era there namely a global NATO without
0:11
territorial
0:12
restrictions this means that NATO could
0:15
also act in Asia and thus against China
0:18
that’s what this next Summit is about
0:23
[Music]
0:35
I find that very well said but I still
0:37
have a few questions you are in German
0:39
politics and you see how everything is
0:41
moving you have been in the bundestag
0:44
for almost 20 years and there was once a
0:46
Germany of villy Brandt and OST politic
0:49
there was once an independent Germany
0:52
even under Angela Merkel there was a
0:54
Germany that said no we need
0:56
nordstream period and then there was Mr
0:59
Schultz standing next to Joe Biden who
1:02
says if Russia does anything with
1:04
Ukraine attacks then nordstream is over
1:07
and Olaf Schultz just stands there I
1:10
have the feeling that Olaf Schultz is
1:11
always being criticized a lot but in
1:14
general Germany seems to be simply
1:16
caught up in this NATO isation at the
1:18
moment as you say and also to be
1:21
mentally and politically trapped can you
1:23
somehow explain to our viewers from the
1:25
political process why the bundestag just
1:28
watches and goes along with it
1:38
[Music]
1:40
well one doesn’t just watch one actually
1:42
actively participates one has agreed to
1:44
the northern expansion of Nato one has
1:47
supported the Fatal decision of the
1:49
Bucharest NATO Summit in 2008 to give
1:52
Georgia and Ukraine the
1:54
perspective now we see what is happening
1:57
in Georgia and Moldova and the entire
1:59
Imperial policy of the EU towards states
2:02
that make Sovereign and Democratic
2:03
decisions like the USA did in 1938 with
2:07
their foreign agents registration act
2:10
Georgia wants to introduce a similar
2:11
transparency law for foreign influence
2:14
and is being pillared for
2:20
[Music]
2:23
it and this is actively supported with
2:26
promotion one is not just a bystander
2:30
what I can observe is that we are
2:32
increasingly having an influence also in
2:35
politics in the media and in the economy
2:38
in all three Central areas in the
2:39
Federal Republic of Germany from
2:42
American interest groups there is a very
2:44
clear interconnection for example in the
2:46
American think tanks whether it is the
2:48
German Marshall fund the Atlantic brooka
2:50
the Atlantic Council or many other think
2:53
tanks that are clearly aimed at
2:54
representing American interests
3:05
in these think tanks department heads
3:07
from major daily newspapers or media
3:09
even from public broadcasting are at the
3:12
Forefront and are part of these
3:14
committees I would wish that these
3:16
journalists were active in the
3:18
Committees of the International Peace
3:20
movement that would indeed be a
3:22
contribution to International
3:24
understanding and not to representing
3:26
the interests of American think tanks
3:29
and found s that Clearly say America
3:32
First it is no different in politics
3:34
many politicians except us from the
3:36
bundestag are members of the Atlantic
3:39
brooka and many other various
3:40
transatlantic
3:48
[Music]
3:51
committees and of course they are also
3:53
influenced or
3:55
integrated we even have the case also in
3:57
the government in Germany that
4:00
individual members have previously gone
4:02
through training programs of American
4:04
foundations or associations private
4:06
organizations I find that highly
4:08
problematic and
4:10
concerning the same applies to the
4:12
economy many people in the global South
4:14
whom I meet just shake their heads and
4:16
say how can it be that politics actually
4:19
only follows the allegiance of the USA
4:21
and does what the USA says
4:32
but why does the economy do that the
4:34
economy must have an interest in its own
4:36
gains and profits therefore it helps to
4:39
look at the ownership structures of the
4:40
major economic companies in Germany the
4:43
largest Dax companies in Germany have
4:45
American firms like black rock as their
4:47
biggest
4:48
shareholders black rock is the largest
4:51
shareholder among the top eight German
4:53
Dax
4:54
companies naturally one wonders how
4:57
decision-making processes come about who
4:59
ultimately makes the
5:08
decisions and that perhaps also explains
5:12
how it is ultimately decided whether to
5:14
actually decide against the interests of
5:16
the German population or the German
5:18
industry or to make decisions in such a
5:21
way that they ultimately satisfy the
5:23
interests of the American Market this is
5:26
how I explain the entire decision-making
5:28
processes why why and how decisions are
5:31
made it is really worth taking a look at
5:33
it to untangle where these actors are
5:36
actually organized from whom they get
5:38
their information and
5:41
handouts sometimes you get the feeling
5:43
that some colleagues have only received
5:45
a memo from the Pentagon which they are
5:47
currently presenting
5:59
you always hear the same tones the same
6:02
choice of words it’s almost Eerie in the
6:04
media as well as from various
6:06
Representatives we don’t have to believe
6:08
in a world conspiracy but there is a
6:11
group of people who understand each
6:12
other and enforce their
6:14
interpretation now we are at the point
6:17
where we really have the okay to use
6:19
German and American weapons in Ukraine
6:22
directly against Russia this has
6:24
enormous escalation potential if the
6:26
Russians shoot back the assumption is
6:29
always that Russia must be punished and
6:31
that Russia when punished will retaliate
6:34
this only comes to mind when it happens
6:36
and then everyone is shocked this
6:38
escalation spiral continues to turn do
6:41
you see any way to end this somehow
6:44
before we end up in the fifth major
6:46
European war in 400
6:58
years I to say that I am also quite
7:01
skeptical about this it shocks me with
7:04
what carelessness some colleagues
7:06
downplay and ignore the risk of
7:08
escalation that clearly exists here
7:11
pretending that there can’t be a nuclear
7:13
disaster in the end where everyone will
7:15
lose is irresponsible all sides will
7:18
lose and it is completely irrelevant who
7:20
ends up being right in some way this
7:23
discussion about international law
7:25
whether it mandates or permits something
7:27
is completely absurd one must must have
7:29
a discussion about what is politically
7:40
necessary what is politically reasonable
7:42
in such a
7:44
situation it’s not just about
7:46
international law above all those who
7:48
point fingers at Russia should question
7:50
their own self-image 25 years ago they
7:53
attacked Yugoslavia and redrew borders
7:55
themselves through the illegal secession
7:57
of Kosovo at the same time they caused a
8:00
million deaths by invading
8:02
Iraq to this day the war crimes
8:05
committed there have not been atoned for
8:07
or
8:15
prosecuted on the contrary journalists
8:18
like my friend Julian Assange who made
8:20
public the war crimes of NATO in
8:22
Afghanistan or the USA and its allies in
8:24
Iraq have been stuck in the high
8:27
security prison in belmarsh in London
8:29
years and are threatened with 175 years
8:32
in prison in the USA because he as a
8:34
journalist told us the
8:36
truth he showed that there are no
8:38
surgically clean Wars with that Wars and
8:41
War policies are simply dirty and
8:43
associated with human rights violations
8:45
and crimes against humanity he’s being
8:48
persecuted I have to say pointing the
8:50
moralizing finger at others this finger
8:53
points back at oneself
9:02
and there I see this ignorance arrogance
9:05
and hubris that risk the lives and
9:07
safety of the population in Europe that
9:10
shakes
9:11
me also those who act contrary to the
9:14
fact that fewer and fewer ukrainians
9:16
want to go to war we have 700,000
9:19
Ukrainian men who have fled to Europe
9:21
because they do not want to die in the
9:23
war shortly after the new recruitment
9:25
law in Ukraine the mobilization law
9:28
there were 95,000 Railway refugees in
9:30
Ukraine because they did not report as
9:33
required by this
9:42
law only one in five of military age is
9:46
willing to go to the front in Ukraine
9:48
and despite the fact that fewer and
9:50
fewer ukrainians want to go to this
9:52
dangerous War there are such debates
9:54
here from armchair strategists whether
9:57
among the greens the social Democrats
9:59
the fdp or especially the
10:02
union they want to continue this war at
10:04
the expense and lives of ukrainians in
10:07
their illusion of being able to achieve
10:09
a victory against Russia a nuclear power
10:11
and I find that really extremely
10:21
dangerous and that is what we are
10:23
experiencing today with the permission
10:26
for the use of German weapons in Ukraine
10:29
against Russia in this war this is a new
10:32
level of escalation because it seems
10:34
that NATO actually wants to create a
10:35
scenario in Ukraine similar to the
10:37
Vietnam War the debate about the
10:40
deployment of NATO ground troops is
10:42
being conducted in parallel before the
10:45
USA officially entered the war in
10:47
1964 with the fabricated tonen incident
10:51
there were already 15,000 us advisers on
10:54
site after a certain period soldiers
10:56
were then sent to protect the advisers
11:07
after a certain period US troops were
11:10
sent to Vietnam to protect the
11:12
instructors it then became quite clear
11:14
that the deployment of their own
11:15
training troops further escalated the
11:17
situation and led to a direct entry of
11:20
the USA into the war this seems to be
11:23
prepared here as well with the dispatch
11:25
of German or other weapons that have a
11:28
range reaching into the major cities in
11:30
Russia and the dispatch of more and more
11:33
instructors we know from the German
11:36
foreign Ministry that there are
11:37
instructors on site British prime
11:40
minister sunak has confirmed that there
11:42
are English instructors
11:51
there the French President maon speaks
11:53
quite openly about his plans to send
11:55
even more NATO troops to Ukraine and on
11:58
a larger scale and quite
12:00
officially these are really Daredevils
12:02
who need to be stopped we need to form a
12:05
large Alliance a cooperation with the
12:07
countries of the South to prevent this
12:10
escalation and the sure path to a third
12:12
world war that is why I am very grateful
12:15
that China and Brazil have now published
12:17
a joint declaration inviting to a peace
12:20
conference including Russia it is
12:22
completely absurd what the Swiss
12:24
conference is doing here
12:35
so a peace conference without Russia
12:36
without the adversaries makes no sense
12:39
at all therefore I hope that China and
12:42
Brazil will take the lead in an
12:44
Initiative for an actual end to this war
12:47
it must be stopped because it really has
12:49
great potential for escalation if NATO
12:52
has direct involvement in the war it
12:54
will ultimately come down to how Russia
12:56
reacts we should not underestimate
12:58
Russia’s reac actions in this context I
13:01
am also concerned that there is even
13:02
this discussion about Western weapons
13:04
and Targets in Russia I am equally
13:06
worried about the deployment of more and
13:08
more trainers from
13:12
[Music]
13:18
NATO the Kev government which has
13:21
dispensed with Democratic elections and
13:23
also massively suppresses the opposition
13:26
even murdering some abroad is acting
13:28
irresponsible responsibly here with
13:30
their attacks on the Russian nuclear
13:32
forces they are playing with the fire of
13:34
a nuclear war they attack the Russian
13:37
nuclear forces in araris with drones
13:40
according to the Russian nuclear
13:42
Doctrine this is an attack on Russia and
13:44
its nuclear forces if one believes that
13:47
this can further draw NATO into this war
13:49
it is not only the security and lives of
13:52
the population in Ukraine that are at
13:53
stake but also the security and lives of
13:56
millions of people across Europe
13:59
[Music]
14:08
and it’s not about absolving Russia of
14:10
all
14:11
guilt you also write in your book that
14:13
The Invasion on February 24th 2022 is a
14:17
violation of international law we all
14:19
admit that but it must also be possible
14:22
to distinguish between what is lawful
14:24
and what is wise more use of weapons
14:26
against Russia will not make Russia say
14:29
okay I’ll withdraw everything unless
14:31
they were to lose because at the moment
14:34
Russia is not losing they are not losing
14:36
this war and Ukraine has every interest
14:39
in further escalating this war it seems
14:42
that the Europeans are happy to go along
14:44
with
14:45
it would you perhaps like to say
14:47
something in closing about how you would
14:49
try to work towards an agreement with
14:51
China and other non-european states
15:03
well you have raised a good point of
15:06
course this is a war in violation of
15:08
international law started by Russia they
15:11
have broken the prohibition of the use
15:12
of force in international relations as
15:14
outlined in the UN Charter this is a
15:17
clear violation of the prohibition of
15:18
the use of
15:20
force but every war also has a history
15:23
this includes the shared responsibility
15:25
of the West especially NATO and the USA
15:28
that is why I am very concerned about
15:30
the upcoming NATO Summit in Washington
15:32
this July there they want to usher in a
15:35
new era namely a global NATO without
15:38
territorial restrictions which also
15:40
extends to Asia and thus targets China
15:43
that is what this next Summit is
15:51
about and that worries me because since
15:54
the mid 1990s an expansion policy
15:57
against Russia has been pursued
15:59
breaking all Mutual
16:01
promises now NATO is moving into Asia
16:03
and wants to expand against China
16:06
according to the USA the main enemy
16:08
China is the main enemy and NATO is also
16:10
trying to establish itself here as an
16:12
anti-chinese military pact in the form
16:15
of bilateral security agreements with
16:17
the Pacific region or with the arming of
16:19
Frontline States against china such as
16:22
the Philippines which are being used and
16:25
that really worries me one must not
16:28
forget the back stories because they are
16:30
the key to resolving the
16:40
conflict and that is where the solution
16:42
for the Ukraine war Lies We need to
16:45
return to a negotiation situation as was
16:47
the case in Istanbul in the spring of
16:49
2022 at that time Ukraine had a much
16:52
better starting position than now this
16:55
means we need to achieve the neutrality
16:57
of Ukraine ultimately it will come down
16:59
to Ukraine remaining neutral the
17:02
integration into NATO structures must be
17:04
reversed there needs to be a roll back
17:07
so that the American bases and
17:08
operations on the border with Russia in
17:10
Ukrainian territory are ended and
17:22
withdrawn so this is the only way I see
17:25
a sustainable peace many other experts
17:28
see it the same way according to the
17:30
Istanbul negotiations even Ukraine was
17:33
almost in agreement with a neutral
17:35
status of course under the condition
17:37
that there would also be a withdrawal of
17:39
Russian troops from Ukraine I hope that
17:41
China Brazil or even Pope Francis can
17:43
actually help to reach a solution here
17:46
this proxy war of NATO poses a great
17:48
danger to World Peace not just to peace
17:51
in Ukraine this war is terrible and
17:53
should be ended it indeed poses a great
17:56
danger to Global Peace therefore all
17:59
states must stand together and do
18:01
everything in their power to deescalate
18:03
and Achieve
18:04
relaxation German foreign policy would
18:06
be well advised to stop traveling around
18:08
the world like a school Master wanting
18:11
to lecture others with a moralizing
18:13
finger and of course being completely
18:15
untrustworthy in its double
18:25
standards keyword arms exports and
18:27
complicity with Israel in the terrible
18:29
Gaza War for example and it is no longer
18:31
taken seriously at all we need to return
18:34
to a policy that focuses on diplomacy
18:37
balancing interests Mutual Security good
18:40
neighborly relations International
18:42
understanding and disarmament the
18:44
pre-requisite for this would of course
18:46
be to have a good neutral status and to
18:48
be a sovereign democracy instead of a
18:51
client state of the NATO leading power
18:53
USA
19:01
amen amen Miss Sim dagdan I absolutely
19:06
agree with you I have the feeling that
19:08
we Europeans once again need to be saved
19:10
from ourselves perhaps this time it will
19:12
come from the global South Miss dagdan
19:16
for those who want to follow you in
19:17
German or in English where should they
19:19
do that on Twitter or where where should
19:22
one get information about your
19:26
work yeah
19:31
yes preferably so detailed reports about
19:33
my work can be found on my homepage simd
19:36
do.de but for current fast-paced updates
19:38
of course there’s Twitter Facebook
19:40
Instagram or now also on Tik Tok
19:43
19:47
Instagram I will put all the links in
19:49
the description Miss dagdan thank you
19:52
very much for your time
19:54
today thank you Mr ladas
19:57
[Music]
oooooo
Geure herriari, Euskal Herriari dagokionez, hona hemen gure apustu bakarra:
We Basques do need a real Basque independent State in the Western Pyrenees, just a democratic lay or secular state, with all the formal characteristics of any independent State: Central Bank, Treasury, proper currency, out of the European Distopia and faraway from NAT0, maybe being a BRICS partner…
Ikus Euskal Herriaren independentzia eta Mikel Torka
ooooooo
MMT: Modern Monetary Theory
Understanding how money works so that we can address climate change easily and prosperously plus address AI’s impact on humanity.
Members: https://x.com/i/communities/1672597800385921024/members
oooooo