Azkenean, GAZAn su etena ezagutu dugu: Su etena
oooooo
redsarah99Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view. #BlackLivesMatterImage may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Mohammad Marandi reacts to TRUMP’S DANGEROUS PLAN TO OCCUPY GAZA https://youtu.be/Y2Hd82yXdOg?si=uUb2h0GujNHyreBl
youtube.com
Mohammad Marandi reacts to TRUMP’S DANGEROUS PLAN TO OCCUPY GAZA
Mohammad Marandi reacts to TRUMP’S DANGEROUS PLAN TO OCCUPY GAZAWatch Mohammad Marandi react
ooo
Mohammad Marandi reacts to TRUMP’S DANGEROUS PLAN TO OCCUPY GAZA
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2Hd82yXdOg)
Mohammad Marandi reacts to TRUMP’S DANGEROUS PLAN TO OCCUPY GAZA Watch Mohammad Marandi react to Trump’s dangerous plan to occupy Gaza and what it means for the region. Stay informed on current events in Gaza and the Middle East with this insightful analysis. He discusses the Gaza ceasefire deal and the role of Middle Eastern countries.
Transkripzioa:
0:36
Hello and welcome to another episode of
0:39
India and Global Left. If you are new to
0:40
our show, please smash that subscribe
0:42
button. You can also support us by
0:44
joining as a YouTube member, be a Patreon
0:46
or donate small amount in the link given
0:48
in the description below. But the least
0:50
you can do is to watch the show, hit
0:52
like, share and please comment. Without
0:54
further ado, let me welcome our guest
0:56
today, Professor Mohammad Marandi.
0:58
Professor Marandi teaches at the
1:00
University of Tehran. Professor Marandi,
1:03
welcome back to India and Global Left.
1:06
Thank you very much for inviting me
1:08
again. I want to discuss
1:11
what’s going on in Washington, DC
1:14
The US will take over the Gaza
1:16
Strip, said Donald Trump
1:19
Tuesday yesterday at a press
1:22
conference in Washington with his buddy
1:24
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
1:26
Netanyahu. We will own it, he
1:29
said, proposing to convert Gaza into a
1:31
new real estate named Riviera.
1:34
I just wanted to ask you, what’s your
1:36
first impression on two things?
1:39
One is to have a
1:41
criminal in the White House
1:44
being given such a reception, and
1:46
secondly, this total disregard
1:49
for any kind of international norm and
1:52
being such a lunatic state as the US is
1:54
always, but so
1:57
brazenly your first impression on these
2:00
two accounts.
2:03
Well, the White House has always housed
2:06
criminals, so you shouldn’t
2:08
expect criminals not to be
2:11
invited as guests.
2:15
Trump is no more or
2:18
no less criminal than
2:20
Biden or Obama. Biden
2:23
brought about the genocide in Gaza. He
2:27
gave the ammunition and the weapons and
2:29
the aid. alongside the Europeans
2:32
and others and regional
2:35
countries like Turkey, like Egypt,
2:38
like Jordan, like the Emirates. They
2:40
facilitated the genocide through
2:42
trade and business. And
2:45
so there are a lot of people who are
2:48
responsible for the genocide.
2:51
And Trump
2:53
isA genocide
2:56
supporter. So he’s no different from
2:58
Biden. And then, of course, Obama, who
3:03
carried out the genocide in Yemen
3:06
alongside the Saudis and the Marathis and
3:09
Europeans and NATO. And then of
3:12
course, the destruction of Libya.
3:15
And as we saw
3:17
recently, Tulsi
3:20
Gabbard in the Senate
3:23
confirmation hearings. She spoke about
3:26
The Dirty war in Syria and about the fake
3:28
chemical attacks and how the United
3:30
States and its allies like Mr. Erdogan,
3:33
among others, supported Al Qaeda and
3:35
ISIS and Syria and finally brought them
3:37
to power. So Trump
3:40
is he has no special
3:43
place in this list of
3:46
genocidal leaders
3:48
or supporters of genocide.
3:51
But I think of course, obviously his.
3:55
statements were void of any
3:57
morality, shameful and
4:00
discussing, but I don’t think it’s,
4:03
at least my interpretation is that it’s
4:04
not a serious um
4:08
plan. I think that
4:11
obviously the people of Gaza,
4:14
the Palestinians there, they
4:17
show that they’re not going anywhere
4:20
after surviving.
4:24
a 16 month long
4:26
Holocaust. But I
4:29
think the real objective is
4:32
probably, and this is just my personal
4:34
speculation,
4:37
is that Trump
4:41
is in a stronger position than
4:43
Netanyahu.
4:46
Netanyahu was forced to accept the
4:47
ceasefire because of the resilience ofThe
4:50
resistance, the axis of resistance,
4:55
Hamas, Islamic Jihad,
4:58
Hezbollah, Al Sarullah, and all of them
5:01
together, put a lot of pressure on the
5:03
Israeli regime and ultimately Trump
5:05
forced the ceasefire.
5:08
And I think that that
5:11
puts him in a commanding position
5:13
compared to Netanyahu.
5:16
And in this
5:19
meeting,I think Trump sort of gave
5:22
this as a said
5:24
this in order to strengthen Netanyahu’s
5:26
position so that Netanyahu would continue
5:29
with the ceasefire. That’s I
5:31
I think that’s how it’s working. I think
5:34
that right now, Netanyahu has a
5:37
problem because he promised his
5:40
fanatical allies in the cabinet that
5:43
he will continue the war and he’ll go
5:45
back to the war. But
5:49
I think Trump doesn’t want war, not
5:50
because he’s a great person, but because
5:53
he he wants quiet. That’s how I see it.
5:57
And so Trump is giving, he’s probably
5:59
given, he’s given some concessions like
6:01
the bunker busters that will be used to
6:03
kill people and innocent people in
6:05
future. And probably he will
6:10
give concessions in the West Bank, I
6:12
assume. Again, it’s speculation.
6:16
But I think what he wants from Netanyahu
6:18
is for him to continue with the
6:19
cease-fire. And so he said this in order
6:22
to make Netanyahu’s coalition
6:24
partners happy. And I think
6:27
they are happy because they’re hoping
6:29
that they can expel the Palestinians.
6:32
So I think maybe the reason why he did
6:35
this was not because he really wants to
6:37
do it, but he wants to strengthen
6:39
Netanyahu’s
6:42
hand. And keep him in
6:44
power and thus Netanyahu will give
6:47
him a concession and that is not to
6:49
expand the war. And also probably
6:52
Netanyahu wants the United States to
6:54
attack Iran. And of course
6:56
that’s I think that would
6:59
bring down the Trump regime
7:02
if there was war with Iran. So I think in
7:05
order to get, you know, AIPAC off his
7:07
back, Netanyahu off his back.
7:10
And to push for the second phase of the
7:12
cease-fire, he said, OK, we’re going to
7:14
empty Gaza of Palestinians and
7:17
we’re not going to implement the third
7:19
phase of the deal. But I think he wants
7:21
at least to get to the second phase,
7:23
finish the second phase of the cease-fire
7:26
agreement. That’s how I see it.
7:29
That’s how I’m interpreting it, because I
7:31
can’t see any scenario when the United
7:33
States goes into Gaza and tries to clear
7:36
out Gaza. It’s not going to happen.
7:40
And no country in the region can
7:42
afford to help them out. I mean,
7:45
true Egypt, Jordan,
7:49
Mr. Erdogan,
7:52
the Emirates, all of them collaborated
7:56
with Israelis or cooperated with
7:58
Israelis, but none of them can afford to
8:00
take in refugees, because I think that
8:02
will be the camel
8:05
that the the straw that breaks the
8:08
camel’s back. In
8:10
fact, when Netanyahu left for
8:13
DC, his finance minister Basil
8:16
Smotrich was threatening to collapse his
8:19
government if he doesn’t restart the
8:22
war with Hamas again. And apparently he
8:25
seems to be a bit happy with what
8:28
Trump has said. But I I
8:30
want to ask you that.
8:34
A key question that has been left out
8:36
open within the cease-fire is
8:39
the question of who rules Gaza.
8:42
And the the answer seems has to be
8:45
quite obvious. It has to be people of
8:47
Gaza who would elect, who would rule
8:50
them. But it seems that Israel,
8:53
the United States and vast majority of
8:55
the West, even France and Germany, which
8:57
came out and condemned what Trump said on
9:00
Tuesday, said that. But we stand by
9:03
the fact that Hamas should go. And it
9:06
seems to me that Trump’s instigation
9:09
kind of blackmails the
9:11
Palestinians to
9:15
to have their own leadership if Hamas
9:17
is their overwhelming charge, which seems
9:20
to be the case. Your comment on that
9:22
observation?Well, first I have to point
9:24
something out and that is that. It
9:27
may be that Trump actually tries to take
9:30
over Gaza. I’m not saying that it won’t
9:32
happen. And my
9:36
inter my
9:38
analysis, my what I feel that
9:40
Trump may be after does not lessen
9:43
the the sheer immorality of his
9:46
statement. And the world should
9:48
mobilize against Trump in the
9:51
United States and condemn him
9:54
for this and to put pressure on regional
9:56
countries to stop. Cooperating with the
9:58
United States and these verbal
10:00
condemnations by governments, these are,
10:02
these are useless. You know, there has to
10:04
be pressure. So I’m not belittling what
10:07
he said. I’m just saying that I don’t
10:09
think that he’s serious about emptying
10:10
Gaza. And it is hypocritical
10:13
that these European regimes
10:16
are condemning him for what he said
10:19
about Gaza, but they supported the
10:21
Holocaust in Gaza. So it’s OK to
10:24
slaughter. the Palestinians,
10:27
but it’s not okay to expel them from
10:30
their land. There is no,
10:34
they’re not taking a moral position.
10:35
These are immoral leaders, just as
10:38
immoral as Trump.
10:42
But I don’t think Trump is, or the
10:44
Europeans are in any position to impose
10:45
anything on Gaza. And Hamas is not
10:48
going to give up
10:51
anyPower or
10:54
authority because they have popular
10:55
support and the allies of Hamas, like
10:58
Islamic Jihad, they are going to
11:00
strengthen Hamas and all of their
11:02
partners in the resistance in Gaza will
11:04
stick with them. The Palestinian
11:06
Authority has no popular support in the
11:09
West Bank. They’re not popular either. In
11:11
polls that were recently carried out,
11:13
they only had a very small
11:16
segment of. Support among the
11:18
population. And those are largely people
11:21
who are corrupted by the system. And
11:23
that’s how the Israelis have been working
11:25
for decades. That’s how the West works.
11:26
That’s how these all these Western NGO’s
11:28
work in Lebanon and elsewhere. They
11:30
corrupt societies and they
11:34
and through them they bring about regime
11:37
change, color revolutions or
11:41
other forms of misery upon people. So
11:44
the Palestinian Authority.
11:47
Is only in power because the Israeli
11:49
regime is behind them in the West Bank.
11:52
But in Gaza they have absolutely no
11:55
chance whatsoever of taking
11:58
over. And we have to all recall that
12:02
you know what happened after the
12:03
elections and how the and how
12:06
Hamas won those elections. If there were
12:08
elections held today, have no doubt that
12:10
not only would Hamas and its
12:12
allies together win in Gaza, they
12:15
would win in the West Bank. But the
12:17
Europeans and Americans, they have no
12:19
interest in democracy. They never had any
12:21
interest in democracy. I think that
12:23
facade that is all gone now
12:26
by after Gaza. I think no
12:29
sane person believes that the West
12:31
believes in human rights or women’s
12:34
rights or children’s rights or any or
12:36
freedom of speech or anything like that.
12:38
That is all out the window. And
12:41
again, it’s it’s just like the Europeans
12:43
condemning. Trump for saying the
12:45
Palestinians but must go. But for 16
12:48
months, almost 16 months, they’ve been
12:49
helping out with the Holocaust.
12:54
The world has to learn how to live with
12:56
Trump, who openly
12:59
threatens the sovereignty of any country.
13:01
But it’s difficult for the
13:04
West to learn to live with someone
13:07
that. The Palestinians
13:10
elect for themselves. I want to ask you
13:13
about the so-called Abraham
13:16
Accord. Given Trump is
13:19
said to be the one of the architects of
13:21
of that accord, which is normalizing ties
13:24
between the absolutist Gulf states,
13:27
including Saudi Arabia and Israel,
13:30
something that Noam Chomsky, when we
13:33
communicated, he used to come to our show
13:36
often and he said that it’s. A coalition
13:39
of reactionary states put together to
13:42
put a further blow in to the rights of
13:44
the Palestinians. Saudi
13:47
Arabia and every other state in the
13:50
region has reacted against
13:53
what Trump said. Does
13:56
this put Trump’s
13:59
own Abrahamic card at stake?
14:04
Well, one a couple of things actually
14:07
that. I can say on about this is
14:10
that whether it’s the Abraham Accords
14:15
or whether it’s just this, you
14:18
know, this claim that regional
14:20
countries are. going to support
14:23
the removal of the Palestinian people.
14:27
What Trump is doing is he’s weakening his
14:28
own allies. He’s weakening this
14:31
these despots because
14:35
whether he’s lying or not,
14:38
that, you know, and whether they really
14:42
in secret agree with him or not
14:44
to to to to try to remove the Palestinian
14:47
people. A lot of people are going to
14:50
question their governments. They’re going
14:51
to question these regimes, people in in
14:54
in these Arab dictatorships in the
14:56
Persian Gulf or in Egypt or in
14:59
Jordan or elsewhere. They’re going to ask
15:02
themselves, are our governments
15:04
secretly negotiating to to to
15:08
help the Americans and Israelis remove
15:09
the Palestinians?So even if it’s not
15:12
true, it raises questions and that
15:15
undermines the
15:17
legitimacy. of these regimes in the eyes
15:20
of their own people. So what Trump is
15:22
doing by making these claims
15:24
is that he’s weakening his own camp. He’s
15:27
weakening members of his own camp. He’s
15:29
weakening these regimes that are
15:32
already weak and vulnerable even
15:35
further. And so
15:38
whether it’s the, and and if it’s the
15:40
Abraham Accords,It’s the same because
15:42
right now, after what happened in Gaza
15:44
and the Holocaust that we saw there, now
15:46
the brutality, the sheer brutality that
15:48
we’re seeing in the West Bank and of
15:50
course the genocidal attacks in Lebanon
15:52
and so on, no
15:55
one can really, you know,
15:58
pursue the Abraham Accords and
16:01
not be afraid. I mean, the Saudis, I’m
16:04
sure, would be very worried about
16:07
taking a step in that direction after
16:09
what has happened in Gaza. So
16:14
it’s going to, if if they do move in that
16:16
direction, there it’s going to be
16:18
costly and dangerous. But in any case,
16:21
Trump has weakened his own allies. He’s
16:23
weakened these practices. And it’s very
16:26
interesting, by the way, that the
16:28
Syrian, the the terrorists who rule
16:31
over Syria right now, the Europeans are
16:34
fine with the terrorists, but they want
16:37
Hamas to go. They’re fine with
16:39
al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria.
16:43
And you see these diplomats and you see
16:45
these politicians from the UK and
16:47
elsewhere going to visit them. But
16:49
Hamas must go. So the people who
16:52
carried out 9/11, the people who carried
16:55
out beheadings, the people who burned all
16:57
these people alive, the people who would
16:59
drown people in cages, these are all
17:01
good. Jolani
17:04
or Sharat. He killed thousands of
17:07
Iraqis and with car bombs in
17:10
Baghdad and other cities. That’s fine. He
17:12
can, you know, he’s a good guy. And
17:15
And it’s and you know, one of the things
17:17
I think is really important is that to
17:19
keep in mind is those those people in our
17:21
region who support these these
17:24
terrorists in Syria, their position is
17:26
very hypocritical because on the one
17:29
hand, they don’t trust the United
17:31
States. They say that the United States
17:33
is. Evil and how it
17:36
conspires against the Palestinian people.
17:39
But on the other hand, they’re on the
17:40
same side as the Americans, and they’ve
17:42
been on the same side as the Americans in
17:44
Syria for the last 1314 years.
17:47
So they’ve been helping the United States
17:49
pursue its dirty war in Syria to to
17:51
destroy Syria along, you know, Mr.
17:54
Erdogan. He’s responsible for the deaths
17:56
of hundreds of thousands of Syrians.
18:00
These people have, they’re
18:02
answerable. They have to, they have to
18:04
answer that question. How is it that US
18:06
policy in Syria is something that you
18:08
support, but you condemn it
18:11
in Palestine?But in any case,
18:15
I think that the
18:19
it’s going to be virtually impossible
18:21
after what has happened in Gaza to
18:24
bring any of the
18:27
regimes in the region. Even those that
18:29
have relations with
18:32
with Netanyahu, like Erdogan, like
18:35
Abdullah of Jordan, like Sisi, and like
18:38
Mohammed bin Zayed, to even to ask them
18:41
to do more than what they’re already
18:43
doing will be very difficult. So I
18:45
think the Abrahams, of course,
18:48
or or the
18:51
the notion of expelling Palestinians from
18:54
their homeland, I think that’s just out
18:56
of the question. We
18:58
had former U.S. ambassador Chaz Freeman
19:01
recently on our show and something he
19:03
said, I wanted your reaction is he said
19:06
Israel has achieved the
19:08
impossible, which is bring together
19:11
the Shia and the Sunni world in
19:14
the Middle East together, at least
19:17
as far as the Palestinian cause goes.
19:21
Do you think there is something in that
19:23
statement?I. Yes, I
19:26
believe that is true to a significant
19:28
degree. The United States
19:31
has been creating divide, a divide
19:34
between a sekarian divide, racial,
19:37
racial. They’ve been using sekarianism,
19:39
racism and religious
19:42
hatred for many years now, many decades
19:45
now, but especially after the revolution
19:46
in Iran, it’s been used much more and
19:49
often through Saudi Arabia in the
19:51
1980s and the 1990s.
19:54
Until, ironically, until Mohammed bin
19:57
Salman came to power, he distanced
19:59
himself from these extremist groups
20:02
and their funding has decreased ever
20:04
since. But I but
20:06
interestingly, now it’s Mr.
20:09
Erdogan who’s taken over and it’s Qatar
20:11
that is funding these extremist groups
20:14
almost exclusively. So they’re now
20:17
his henchmen.
20:21
But yes, these these groups have had a
20:23
huge impact.
20:26
But I think that after the sacrifices
20:29
made by Hezbollah and Gaza, which are
20:32
unique, I mean, the people of Gaza fought
20:34
for their lives, but Hezbollah willingly
20:37
sacrificed themselves to help to save the
20:40
people of of Gaza. And the war on the
20:42
Lebanese border was
20:45
was unprecedented. There’s never been
20:48
such an intense war between the Israeli
20:50
regime and anyone
20:54
compared to when when we look at what was
20:57
going on for a couple of months along the
20:59
Lebanese border. And ultimately the,
21:02
you know, the ceasefire was just
21:08
a a decrease in the hostilities.
21:10
Otherwise, the Israelis kept their forces
21:13
along in the north. So Hezbollah,
21:16
They made huge sacrifices. Ansarullah
21:19
made huge sacrifices. The Iraqis and we
21:21
saw that in Abu Ubaidah’s speech. He
21:24
thanked Iran, he thanked Hezbollah, he
21:26
thanked Ansarullah, he thanked the Iraqis
21:28
and he thanked Jordanian citizens
21:31
who on their own, at their, at their own
21:34
initiative, went into Palestine and
21:36
fought and were martyred.
21:39
So I think that is that is very
21:41
substantial and that I think.
21:47
uh weakened this
21:50
racist and
21:52
sectarian narrative that has been
21:55
created for, that has been promoted for
21:58
decades now, and it currently is being
22:00
promoted by Qatar and and others and
22:03
and Turkey and the Turkish regime.
22:06
But But in any case, it is something that
22:09
should be of concern always,
22:12
because as the West grows weaker,
22:15
In order to maintain hegemony,
22:18
they have to use the tools of divide and
22:21
rule more extensively.
22:25
My final question is about
22:28
US Iran relationship.
22:31
Donald Trump, just having come to power,
22:34
also signed an executive order to
22:38
impose the sanctions even more
22:40
brutally on Iran while.
22:44
Maintaining that he is
22:46
open to a deal, that’s something that he
22:49
is doing even with the Russians, even
22:51
with everyone. And I
22:54
wanted to ask you, what’s the
22:56
feeling in in
22:59
Tehran and Iran in general about
23:02
the US at this moment as far as the
23:05
relationship goes?And secondly,
23:08
to what extent is Iran
23:11
worried about further sanctions given
23:14
a lot of oil trade now goes to
23:17
China and the United States
23:20
is imposing tariff war and trade
23:22
war on China as well?
23:26
To what degree the US can actually
23:28
hurt the Iranian
23:31
economy given there is also.
23:35
Idea and popularity among sections
23:39
in Iran that they should normalize
23:41
relationship with the West because the
23:43
economy takes the toll.
23:48
Well, I’ve been in Moscow for the last
23:51
three, you know, days, so I
23:54
don’t know exactly. I don’t. I have to go
23:56
back to Tehran to be able to better to
23:58
give a better answer to that question.
24:02
I, as far as I know, and I’ve been very
24:04
busy, so I haven’t been following the
24:06
news as well as I should have. But as far
24:09
as I know, it’s not an executive order.
24:12
But in any case, the United
24:15
States has already has already imposed
24:17
maximum pressure sanctions on Iran. When
24:20
Biden came to power, he did not remove
24:23
any of those sanctions. In fact, he’s
24:25
repeatedly been. adding new sanctions,
24:28
you know, for two new companies or
24:30
companies that have been created, they
24:31
get sanctioned and so on. So
24:34
there really isn’t anything for Trump to
24:37
sanction. And it’s just like Russia, Iran
24:40
and Russia are both basically under
24:42
maximum pressure sanctions. In fact,
24:44
recently the Russian oil fleet and the
24:47
the the oil and gas companies which have
24:49
been which have been sanctioned.
24:51
Basically what that’s done is it made
24:54
RussiaBecome more like
24:56
Iran, because Iran has already been
24:58
sanctioned this oil
25:01
and gas industry completely, this banking
25:03
industry as well. So the
25:06
Iranians have learned how to circumvent
25:08
the sanctions regime, and it does
25:11
trade with China, not because
25:14
during the last four years the United
25:16
States has become more lenient, but
25:17
because Iran and. China devised
25:20
new ways to do trade without being
25:22
vulnerable to the Americans, without
25:24
using Western financial institutions
25:27
and so on, and by not
25:29
using tankers that are under the
25:32
authority of the West or or fearful of
25:34
Western
25:37
dictates. So I I
25:40
cannot say for certain, but I think it
25:42
will be much more difficult for Trump. To
25:44
be able to put pressure on you on this
25:46
time run. I’m not saying he’s not going
25:48
to do anything or that he won’t be able
25:49
to do some things, but it’s this is not a
25:52
seven years ago. The situation is much
25:55
different. And China, as I think you
25:58
were alluding, as you were saying, I
26:00
think you’re implying that China is also
26:05
different from the China 7-8 years ago
26:07
and it it has a vested interest in
26:10
ignoring the United States. Or or
26:13
resist or is going to resist the United
26:15
States more today than before.
26:18
So I don’t think that the the Americans
26:20
have many cards up their sleeves and and
26:23
and Trump doesn’t have a special card up
26:25
his sleeve that
26:28
Biden didn’t have. There’s nothing new
26:31
in you know his there’s nothing new. He
26:33
doesn’t have some special power or some
26:35
special authority that didn’t exist
26:37
before. So I think it’s going to be
26:40
more difficult. In Iran,
26:43
there are those who want an agreement
26:45
with the United States. But I think that
26:48
in general, the the the
26:51
mood in Tehran is different from
26:53
2015. In
26:55
2015, after we signed a nuclear
26:57
agreement with the United States, they
27:00
began violating it from day one under
27:02
Obama. And then Trump tore up the
27:03
agreement. So even though many do want an
27:06
agreement, but they don’t want to be
27:08
cheated again like in
27:10
2015. So Iran is
27:13
and also Iran’s position today is much
27:15
stronger than it was back then and the
27:17
United States has much more, many more
27:19
difficulties like the war in Ukraine. So
27:22
the circumstances have changed. Iran has
27:24
a stronger position and
27:28
and also. You know, Trump, not only did
27:31
he, not only did the United States
27:33
violate the JCPOA, the nuclear deal and
27:35
then later on tear it, Trump tear it,
27:37
tore it up. But also we saw the Minsk
27:39
Accords, how the West betrayed Russia.
27:41
And also now Trump is saying the third
27:44
phase of the cease-fire agreement is
27:47
is is is rubbish
27:50
and shouldn’t be implemented. That’s a
27:53
cease-fire that was basically signed
27:55
under his pressure. So if Trump is going
27:57
to betray the Palestinians and the
27:59
Russians and the Iranians, I mean, if we
28:00
look at his past track record, that
28:03
is going to make it all the more
28:04
difficult for Iranians and Russians to
28:07
negotiate with Trump in the future
28:08
because he’s simply not someone who can
28:10
be trusted. So negotiations with the
28:13
United States, potential negotiations, I
28:16
don’t know if they will take place. But
28:20
it’s the Iranians are going to be much
28:22
more cautious than before.
28:26
Professor Morandi, thank you so much for
28:28
joining us. Thank you very much for
28:30
having me.
28:31
Hi, my name is Ayushman. I,
28:34
along with Jyotishman, have started this
28:37
platform. The last two years we have
28:40
tried to build content for the left and
28:42
progressive forces. We have interviewed
28:45
economists, historians, political
28:47
commentators and activists so far.
28:51
If you have liked our content so far
28:54
and want us to build an archive for the
28:56
left, I have two requests for you.
28:59
Please do consider donating for the
29:02
cause. Link is in the description below.
29:05
Also, if you are not able to do so, don’t
29:08
feel sad. You can always like our videos
29:11
and share our videos to your comrades.
29:14
Finally, don’t forget to hit the
29:16
subscribe button.
oooooo
Arab world would ‘not allow’ U.S. takeover of Gaza: Palestinian represen… https://youtu.be/YDrG1HV4SlY?si=mLmLUzuGk3YqFlFQ
ooo
Arab world would ‘not allow’ U.S. takeover of Gaza: Palestinian representative | Power & Politics
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDrG1HV4SlY)
U.S. President Donald Trump said he wants the United States to take over and redevelop Gaza after resettling Palestinians elsewhere. Mona Abuamara, chief representative of the Palestinian General Delegation to Canada, says Trump’s proposal is ‘outrageous.’ Plus, the CBC’s Caroline Barghout is in Washington with more on the story.
Transkripzioa:
0:00
the US will take over the Gaza Strip and
0:03
we will do a job with it too we’ll own
0:05
it we have an opportunity to do
0:08
something that could be phenomenal and I
0:11
don’t want to be cute I don’t want to be
0:13
a wise guy but the Riviera of the Middle
0:15
East this could be something that could
0:17
be so bad this could be so
0:20
magnificent that was US president Donald
0:22
Trump last night saying he wants the
0:24
United States to take ownership of Gaza
0:26
and redevelop it these comments after
0:28
Trump said Palestinians living in Gaza
0:31
should be resettled outside of the
0:32
territory the cbc’s Caroline Bargo is in
0:35
Washington with more on this story so
0:37
Caroline what what more is the White
0:38
House said about this plan today well
0:41
today the White House is standing behind
0:43
US president Donald Trump’s plan to take
0:45
over Gaza and turn it into the Rivier of
0:48
the Middle East as you just heard him
0:50
say he would like the more than two
0:52
million Palestinians who live in Gaza to
0:55
move to either Jordan or Egypt even
0:58
though both countries rejected that idea
1:01
Trump said that he is not opposed to
1:03
using US troops to get them out now
1:06
White House Press Secretary Caroline
1:08
levit held a press conference today and
1:10
she was asked a lot about Trump’s
1:12
comments on Gaza she said that Trump
1:14
made them with a humanitarian heart with
1:17
the idea of peace for the Middle East
1:20
she was also asked how this fits into
1:22
the United States America’s first policy
1:25
and this is what she said take a listen
1:27
this is an outof the-box idea that’s who
1:30
president Trump is that’s why the
1:31
American people elected him um and his
1:34
goal is lasting peace in the Middle East
1:37
for all people in the region we’ve had
1:40
the same people pushing the same
1:42
solutions to this problem for decades
1:45
and it’s been very made very clear to
1:46
the president uh that the United States
1:49
needs to be revolve involved in this
1:51
rebuilding effort um to ensure stability
1:54
in the
1:55
region Secretary of State Marco Rubio
1:58
was also asked about Trump’s Gaza plan
2:00
and he called it generous here’s what he
2:03
said take a listen the only thing
2:05
president Trump has done very generously
2:06
in my view is offer the United States
2:09
willingness to step in clear the debris
2:12
clean the place up from all the
2:14
destruction that’s on the ground clean
2:16
it up of all these unexploded Munitions
2:18
and in the meantime the people living
2:20
there will not be able the people who
2:22
call that home will not be able to live
2:23
there while you have Crews coming in and
2:25
removing debris while you have Munitions
2:27
being removed
2:30
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
2:31
Netanyahu is still in Washington and
2:34
today he met with defense secretary Pete
2:36
hegseth at the Pentagon Heth was asked
2:39
by reporters about Trump’s Gaza plan and
2:41
you and possibly sending US troops to
2:44
Gaza and here is what he
2:46
said president inv is involved in very
2:49
complex and highlevel negotiations of
2:51
great consequence uh to both the United
2:54
States and the state of Israel and we
2:56
look forward to working with our allies
2:57
our counterparts both diplomatically and
2:59
militarily to look at all
3:02
options now last night Trump was also
3:04
asked about annexing the West Bank and
3:06
he said he would have a decision on that
3:08
in about four weeks okay there is some I
3:12
I guess inconsistencies in all the
3:13
different statements there Caroline to
3:15
be generous um I wonder what has some of
3:18
the reaction been in the United States
3:20
beyond the people who work directly for
3:22
president Trump well as you can imagine
3:24
the reaction was pretty mixed here in
3:26
Washington there are some Republicans
3:28
who were standing behind Trump’s idea to
3:31
take over the Gaza Strip and turn it
3:33
into the Riviera of the Middle East as
3:35
he liked to call it uh one of those
3:37
Republicans was house Speaker Mike
3:39
Johnson he was asked about it and this
3:41
is what he said that area is so
3:44
dangerous and he’s taking bold decisive
3:46
action to try to ensure the Peace of
3:48
that region um it’s a it’s a bold move
3:51
certainly uh far Bolder than what’s been
3:53
done before but um I I think we’ve got
3:56
to stand unequivocally in an unwavering
3:58
manner as the whip say
4:00
uh with Israel our closest Ally and
4:02
friend in the Middle
4:04
East but not all Republicans were keen
4:07
on the idea in fact both Republicans and
4:10
Democrats spoke up today against the
4:12
plan here’s what they had to
4:14
say I can report that I was speechless
4:18
I’m speechless that’s insane I can’t
4:20
think of a place on Earth that would
4:22
welcome American troops less and where
4:26
any positive outcome is less likely when
4:29
Donal Trump sees a strip of land that’s
4:31
being wasted that way he he has a
4:34
builder sees opportunity and um and we
4:37
appreciate his vision but I think in
4:39
terms of an occupying of Gaza the only
4:42
way we would ever I think if at all want
4:46
to do that would be at their
4:47
invitation a critics of Trump’s plan
4:50
have called it ethnic cleansing and
4:52
colonialism now some people don’t
4:54
actually believe that he’s serious there
4:56
are some that say that this is just
4:58
Trump’s way of negoti ating and trying
5:00
to bring the temperature down in the
5:02
Middle East but there’s also concern
5:04
that his plan is going to inflame
5:07
tensions in the region now Pete heg or
5:10
excuse me Benjamin Netanyahu the Israeli
5:12
Prime Minister he is still here in
5:14
Washington he’s actually extended his
5:16
trip until Saturday and then he will
5:18
head home at that point all right
5:19
Caroline a lot to go through thanks for
5:21
doing with us that’s the cbc’s Caroline
5:23
Bargo in Washington well foreign affairs
5:25
minister Melanie Jolie came out against
5:27
President Trump’s comments today writing
5:30
Canada’s long-standing position on Gaza
5:32
has not changed we are committed to
5:33
achieving a two-state solution where
5:35
Israelis and Palestinians can live
5:37
securely within internationally
5:39
recognized borders there is no role for
5:41
Hamas in the governance of Gaza we
5:44
support Palestinians right to
5:45
self-determination including from being
5:48
forcibly displaced from Gaza for more
5:51
reaction to the president’s proposal I’m
5:53
joined by Mona Abu Amar the chief
5:54
representative of the Palestinian
5:56
General delegation to Canada Mona Abu am
5:58
it’s good to see you again thank you for
5:59
being here thank you for having me um
6:01
you know the White House has said this
6:03
was a generous offer uh from the
6:06
president and just essentially a
6:07
remediation cleanup and rebuilding
6:09
proposal do you view it that way of
6:11
course not so uh had it been generosity
6:15
we wouldn’t have had um all of these
6:18
buildings and uh these cities and
6:21
Villages and uh uh refugee camps
6:25
demolished and annihilated by us bombs
6:29
which now they want to clean up and
6:32
clean up uh ethnically cleanse while
6:35
ethnically cleansing the Palestinian
6:36
people with that he sounded very serious
6:38
and clear as I was listening to the
6:40
president last night right he was asked
6:42
I I believe it was Caitlyn Collins at
6:43
CNN he said where do you expect the
6:46
people there to go and who would live
6:47
there when it’s rebuilt and he said oh
6:49
the world would live there it would be a
6:50
great development so they’re they’re
6:52
walking it back today but what which do
6:55
you believe do do you believe the
6:56
president maybe was not being serious
6:58
got too far ahead
7:00
himself how do you parse it um
7:02
unfortunately in my opinion
7:05
uh Trump and uh Netanyahu uh look at us
7:10
from Golden towers and along with their
7:13
Bunch uh of other uh people in crowds
7:17
and they look at us with a um illusion
7:22
that uh they know what we want and they
7:24
can control where and how we would uh
7:28
like to live
7:30
while normalizing that oppression and
7:33
thinking that you can sell and buy
7:35
anything including people two-thirds of
7:38
the the homes and buildings in in Gaza
7:41
are either damaged or completely
7:42
destroyed by by the bombardments over
7:44
the past uh year and a bit um I I I
7:48
wonder what your thoughts are about what
7:50
this does for this very delicate
7:52
ceasefire process because you know um
7:56
Saudi Arabia Jordan Egypt have all
7:58
rejected this you’ve rejected this idea
8:00
but it comes at a time when things are
8:02
delicate right to keep things what what
8:04
are your concerns there so we know that
8:07
the Arab world would not allow for such
8:10
a thing to happen because uh we have
8:13
experienced that before we have been
8:16
ethnically cleansed from our Villages
8:18
and from our uh cities from our Our Land
8:21
stolen and we will never allow for that
8:24
to happen again and so uh do the Arab uh
8:28
countries think
8:30
especially uh Jordan and uh Egypt and uh
8:33
Israel would like to think that they
8:35
don’t want to take refugees or
8:38
Palestinians there because they don’t
8:40
allow anyone who leaves to come back but
8:43
the actual issue is that uh Palestinian
8:46
refugees are the only ones who are in
8:49
the world who are not allowed to go back
8:52
to their land so we’re not going to risk
8:54
it and and gazin will not risk it so the
8:57
president is right on one thing that
8:58
there is a significant rebuilding job
9:00
that needs to happen in that territory
9:03
um and and there are issues with
9:05
unexploded ordinance and other things
9:07
that do need a level of remediation to
9:09
to make it safe again so how do you how
9:12
do you see that proceeding right because
9:15
people want to be in their home near
9:17
their home and on the land they call
9:19
home but there is the reality of a lack
9:21
of shelter lack of safety how do you how
9:23
do you balance that uh in terms of the
9:25
rebuilding and people being allowed to
9:27
stay on the land that is their th those
9:30
are two separate things um just talking
9:33
about people allowed or not being
9:35
allowed to stay uh on their land is
9:39
outrageous uh stunning as you said in
9:41
the beginning uh I think that this is
9:46
since the beginning of this aggression
9:48
on Gaza this has been premeditated it
9:50
has been a premeditated accelerated
9:53
ethnic cleansing
9:55
um
9:57
structural and completion of uh the plan
10:01
that has started in
10:03
1948 but the ceasefire was only achieved
10:08
because the US prom made promises to
10:11
Netanyahu and part of those promises
10:14
were to allow um the his right uh uh
10:19
government uh to Annex the west bank and
10:24
to push people uh out of Gaza so um the
10:29
situation that we are here at is by a
10:32
colonizer mindset that uh is uh thinking
10:37
in a supremacist type of sit way uh not
10:40
seeing what those people mean or um
10:44
Worth right and the president did say
10:46
he’d have a decision on the West Bank
10:48
his decision on the West Bank in about
10:50
four weeks and maybe maybe I Mis phrase
10:52
my last question I I don’t mean allowed
10:53
to stay then I mean able to stay while
10:56
while the rebuilding work and the
10:57
remediation work is happening just in a
10:59
practical sense um you know what needs
11:02
to happen for for for the gazin who you
11:04
know after being sort of pinned into
11:06
Southern Gaza are now spreading out but
11:07
there’s a lack of shelter there
11:09
necessarily and things need to be worked
11:10
on and fixed I mean how do you
11:12
practically see that proceed yeah so
11:14
first of all they shouldn’t have allowed
11:17
uh Israel to do so now they should uh
11:21
allow trucks to bring in Caravans and um
11:25
tents and all of those uh to make Gaza
11:29
viable again which Israel made sure it’s
11:32
not so it would be easier to push people
11:35
uh out um from it so it’s also in the
11:40
hand of the International Community and
11:41
how they react to that and how fast they
11:45
try to um make the situation easier for
11:49
the Palestinian people who went in in um
11:54
uh 400,000 people went back to the north
11:57
where it’s the most damage because they
12:00
wanted to go home and I’ve heard from
12:03
them saying if the war starts again if
12:06
the aggression starts again they will
12:08
not leave their homes once again so it’s
12:12
uh uh Israel wants to complete uh the
12:16
the the job it started doing by
12:18
demolishing every single um home and
12:22
building in Gaza but the people said if
12:25
that’s going to happen it will happen
12:27
while we’re in them I I have seen some
12:29
reporting though at mono bu of people
12:31
saying that conditions are so desperate
12:34
they they might have to leave you know
12:35
what I mean like it’s just the
12:37
circumstances will force them because of
12:39
the the consequences of of all of this
12:41
fighting I mean what what are your
12:43
concerns there in terms of just how many
12:44
people out of sheer necessity might just
12:46
choose to leave Gaza and try to go
12:48
somewhere else out of sheer necessity
12:51
everybody needs would need uh to leave
12:55
because of the um nonviability of the
12:59
situation in there but how many would
13:02
want to leave knowing that they can’t
13:04
come back there’s a difference if they
13:07
are allowed to come back that’s one
13:09
thing but if there is this colonial
13:13
mindset of occupying switching the
13:16
occupation from Israeli occupation to
13:18
American occupation is just ridiculous
13:21
there there has been pretty strong push
13:23
back against this um you know and and
13:26
there was even some some liberal MPS
13:27
issued a statement calling for C did
13:29
announce it I know you saw the statement
13:30
there from Melanie Jolie just before we
13:32
started this conversation have you
13:34
spoken to anyone in the Canadian
13:36
government about this and and what’s
13:37
your sense of the Canadian response um
13:39
so I reached out for an urgent meeting I
13:41
didn’t hear back yet um hopefully I’ll
13:44
have uh a chance uh to do so soon uh I
13:48
saw the statement it was a little too
13:51
late late uh in in the day after um
13:55
Trump started retracting his steps and
13:58
after the whole outrage uh in the world
14:01
I expected Canada to be a leader even in
14:04
statements at least uh if not in action
14:07
Saudi Arabia was at at 4:00 a.m. in
14:10
exactly so um the situation now needs
14:14
Canada to actually recognize Palestine
14:16
if it Minister Julie said she is uh that
14:20
Canada is still adamant to reach uh to
14:23
help reach the two-state solution we are
14:26
talking right now about not having any
14:29
land to talk about for a two-state
14:31
solution so if Canada wants actually to
14:33
help it needs to prove it through action
14:36
do you think as as a final point the
14:38
ongoing trade dispute with with
14:40
President Trump over the border and the
14:42
Liberals are changing leaders I I mean
14:44
you think those two things U make it
14:48
difficult for Canada to do what you’re
14:49
suggesting Canada should do well if
14:51
every uh country that is threatened
14:54
would bend international law and uh
14:57
water it down then we will turn into a
15:00
jungle and people actually don’t know
15:03
who Palestinians are what we had to
15:05
endure and what we are willing to endure
15:08
simply because we don’t have any other
15:11
option so we’re not leaving okay uh mono
15:14
ABA uh when we find out what the
15:15
president has to say about the West Bank
15:17
uh we want have your reaction to that Mo
15:18
mono buis Chief representative of the
15:20
Palestinian General delegation to Canada
15:22
thank you for being here thank you for
15:23
having
oooooo
@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu
Gaza Could Be Next ‘Mogadishu on the Mediterranean’: Stroul https://youtu.be/9zpEjcL6V8I?si=_8zH7su6ykYDemQy
youtube.com
Gaza Could Be Next ‘Mogadishu on the Mediterranean’: Stroul
Washington Institute Senior Fellow Dana Stroul and Bloomberg Opinion’s Marc Champion react to President Trump floating US control of Gaza and t
ooo
Gaza Could Be Next ‘Mogadishu on the Mediterranean’: Stroul
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zpEjcL6V8I)
Washington Institute Senior Fellow Dana Stroul and Bloomberg Opinion’s Marc Champion react to President Trump floating US control of Gaza and the different paths forward in the region.
US President Donald Trump’s idea of depopulating and taking over Gaza was welcomed in Israel, though widely condemned elsewhere in the Middle East and even among Washington’s top European allies.
Israeli lawmakers praised the surprise proposal as a means to end the war with Hamas, currently paused amid a fragile six-week ceasefire. The Palestinian Authority, which controls parts of the West Bank though not Gaza, quickly rejected the suggestion, saying the group would oppose “all calls for the displacement of the Palestinian people from their homeland.”
Saudi Arabia called the plan an “infringement on the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people.” The kingdom is at the heart of Trump’s goal of shaking up the order of the Middle East, with the US president keen for it to normalize ties with Israel.
The initial reaction on both sides was one of confusion. No one, including Israel, was expecting Trump to suggest his country step in and rebuild the coastal Palestinian territory, creating what he called a new “Riviera.” The approach would, according to Trump, require moving more than 2 million Gazans out of the war-ravaged enclave, with the president even raising the possibility of deploying US troops.
“The US will take over the Gaza Strip,” Trump said Tuesday at a press conference in Washington with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “We’ll own it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site.”
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the idea in a briefing with reporters on Wednesday, while downplaying the US resources that would be necessary and saying Trump’s focus would be on “striking a deal” that saw regional partners facilitate the arrangement.
“That does not mean boots on the ground in Gaza. It does not mean American taxpayers will be funding this effort,” Leavitt said.
But the spokeswoman sidestepped questions about whether any ally had endorsed the effort and responded to questions about the massive logistical undertaking by saying only that the White House “will continue to keep you apprised of updates as we receive them.”
Trump’s suggestions have broadened the debate about the future of Gaza, which has been devastated by 16 months of war between Israel and Hamas, the Iran-backed militant group that runs the territory. The vast majority of the population has been displaced into camps due to heavy Israeli bombardments of urban areas, and essentials such as medicine, food and clean water are in short supply.
The ceasefire started last month — a deal brokered by the US, Qatar and Egypt and for which Trump took credit. Talks about a second phase got underway this week and one Arab official, speaking privately, said the timing of the US President’s comments could jeopardize those negotiations. Gazans would be highly likely to resist any attempt to displace them, the official said, adding that Iran would exploit the anger over the proposal, raising tensions in the region.
Transkripzioa:
0:00
I do think that there’s a huge difference in the situation between his
0:04
first term and this, you know, his second term.
0:07
You know, in his first term, the interests of the Gulf states and Israel
0:12
were more or less aligned, that their biggest concern was Iran, the threat
0:16
from Iran. And so he was able then to get the
0:21
Abrams accords. And after that, the Biden administration
0:25
was able to talk to the Saudis about similar deals
0:29
because there was no real impediment. And this time around, since October 23,
0:36
when you got the you know, you’ve had the war in Gaza in between, and also the
0:41
sort of interests of Saudi Arabia in particular have changed, much more
0:45
focused on the economy and stability. Less worried about Iran.
0:49
You now have a different situation. And I just think it’s going to be quite
0:53
difficult to bring these different interests together where you’ve got the
0:57
domestic political concerns of Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states now focused
1:02
on their own populations and their view of Gaza.
1:05
And it just makes it harder to bring everybody together.
1:08
And I’m not clear that, you know, he’s got a plan for that.
1:12
Dana, when we think about what is the plan, though, for Palestinians, you
1:15
know, Marc’s column gets into, you know, Gaza is a demolition site.
1:19
You know, it’s a mess. And to think about the Palestinians
1:25
going back there, I mean, how do they live?
1:27
There’s no infrastructure. So there needs to be some kind of
1:30
rebuild. And you do wonder how you know, how this
1:33
happens going forward. How do you see it playing out in terms
1:39
of. Yeah.
1:40
First of all, the estimates for the cost of rebuilding Gaza are upwards of $80
1:46
billion. And we’re probably talking about decades
1:49
to clear out the rubble and rebuild Gaza.
1:52
So there’s not really a temporary relocation of Palestinians.
1:57
And based on past U.S. experiences, for example, post-conflict
2:00
reconstruction in Iraq and then Afghanistan, the difference in Gaza is
2:04
how concentrated the destruction is and the closed nature of the border.
2:08
So civilians can’t move around when we’re trying to get ordnance, unexploded
2:13
mines and bombs and the rubble cleared out.
2:16
So this was always going to be a huge challenge.
2:19
Just on on the on the remarks about the region, what’s totally different from
2:24
Trump’s first term is the strategic nature of the Middle East.
2:28
Iran is more vulnerable today than it ever has been because of Israel’s
2:32
military strikes that have taken out its air defenses.
2:34
Bashar al Assad has gone in Syria. There’s also a cease fire in Lebanon and
2:39
a chance an opportunity to re-imagine a Lebanon without a stranglehold of
2:43
Hezbollah governance. And the same thing in Hamas in Gaza.
2:47
Trump can’t do this alone. He needs the Europeans.
2:50
He needs the Arab leaders. And I think there’s an opportunity here
2:54
for four different leaders to bring things to the table.
2:56
It’s not only about Gaza sticking on Gaza.
3:00
It does raise the question of what the future of Gaza is if this ceasefire
3:04
holds, if and when the war does end. What is the plan for Gaza if the United
3:10
States does not go through with the plan that President Trump said yesterday at
3:14
the White House on the current trajectory, without anything other than
3:19
what we see right now, Gaza is probably going to become something like Mogadishu
3:23
on the Mediterranean. There’s no non Hamas alternative to
3:27
governing Gaza. We’ve seen that there’s plenty of Hamas
3:30
guys who have come out of the tunnels, put their uniforms back on, are
3:34
distributing humanitarian aid and telling people, we’re going to help you
3:37
get back to your homes and we’re going to help you rebuild.
3:40
So that means that Hamas reconstitutes it regains governance over Gaza and its
3:47
remaining leaders have already threatened to do October 7th, over and
3:50
over and over. Yeah.
oooooo
@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu
Fmr. Head of Saudi Arabian Intelligence Reacts to Trump’s Proposal for G… https://youtu.be/QqGRjiSnoO4?si=wss1TdHzVcurhT_S
Fmr. Head of Saudi Arabian Intelligence Reacts to Trump’s Proposal…
Trump is banking on rich Arab countries and kingdoms to support and implement his vision. Qatar, the
ooo
Fmr. Head of Saudi Arabian Intelligence Reacts to Trump’s Proposal for Gaza | Amanpour and Company
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqGRjiSnoO4)
Trump is banking on rich Arab countries and kingdoms to support and implement his vision. Qatar, the main regional mediator, has already said it plans to help rebuild Gaza — while the Palestinians remain on their land. The United States wants normalization between Israel and Saudi Arabia, but the Saudi foreign minister has also rejected the Trump plan. Former Saudi Intelligence Chief and former Ambassador to the United States Turki Al Faisal joins Christiane from the capital, Riyadh.
Originally aired on February 5, 2025
Major support for Amanpour and Company is provided by Jim Attwood and Leslie Williams, Candace King Weir, the Sylvia A. and Simon B. Poyta Programming Endowment to Fight Antisemitism, the Leila and Mickey Straus Family Charitable Trust, Mark J. Blechner, the Filomen M. D’Agostino Foundation, Seton J. Melvin, the Peter G. Peterson and Joan Ganz Cooney Fund, Charles Rosenblum, Koo and Patricia Yuen, Barbara Hope Zuckerberg, and Jeffrey Katz and Beth Rogers.
Transkripzioa:
0:00
uh Prince turkey welcome to the program
0:02
you you have been digesting what came
0:05
from the White House last night you
0:07
probably heard uh the view from rala so
0:10
is there going to be a United Arab front
0:14
against this uh Trump Vision thank you
0:18
Miss Amur for inviting me after hearing
0:21
Mr baruti I really don’t know what to
0:24
add to what he said other than to say
0:27
that what came out of Mr Trump is not
0:29
digest able I respectfully decline to
0:33
add more disrespectful comments to that
0:36
but uh it is uh a fantasy to think that
0:41
ethnic cleansing in the 21st century can
0:44
be condoned by a world community that
0:47
stays on its behinds and does not
0:50
respond to that the problem in Palestine
0:54
is not the Palestinians it is the
0:56
Israeli occupation and this has been
1:00
clear and understood by everybody hence
1:03
you have United Nations resolutions
1:06
calling for the quid Proco of land for
1:10
peace from 1967 until now the Arab peace
1:14
initiative of course is based on that
1:17
and offered Israel not only diplomatic
1:19
relation but all of the things that
1:22
Israel wanted from trade from uh
1:25
normalization Etc in return for the
1:28
establishment of a pales alian state
1:31
with its capital in East Jerusalem all
1:33
of these things were American policy
1:37
until this latest wording that Mr Trump
1:40
has chosen to use in uh claiming that he
1:45
wants to better things when actually it
1:48
is going to turn things into more
1:50
conflict and more Bloodshed um can I
1:53
draw on your long long years of
1:56
experience you were Saudi ambassador to
1:58
America
2:00
what would you be telling your Capital
2:02
your king in a
2:04
cable had you been in Washington last
2:07
night in that position and listen to
2:09
what came from the podium what would you
2:11
how would you have explained it well I
2:13
can tell you I’m glad I am not in that
2:16
position because there is no way that I
2:18
can explain it it comes out of the blue
2:23
and it is totally based on as Mr baruti
2:26
said on the Israeli position of ethnic
2:30
cleansing as you mentioned yourself Mr
2:34
benir who is the ultimate ethnic
2:37
cleanser in Palestine he’s been saying
2:40
this for the last two and a half years
2:42
since he joined the government and now
2:44
he is justifying what he said by the
2:47
words of the American president that is
2:52
unacceptable so what then is the next
2:55
step we’ve had everybody you know from
2:57
your Capital to the neighboring
2:59
countries which Trump expects to take
3:01
these you know millions of Palestinians
3:03
reject this out of hand say that it’s
3:05
illegal we’ve heard the president of the
3:07
Palestinian
3:08
Authority what do you think is the next
3:12
step what do you think is going to
3:13
happen I’m not in government so I don’t
3:16
know what my government will will
3:18
propose but I would expect that there
3:20
will be Collective action on the part
3:22
not only of the Arab but Muslim world as
3:25
well along with Europeans and other
3:27
countries that believe in the two-state
3:29
solution
3:30
to take up the matter and where else but
3:33
go to the United Nations and this is the
3:35
only Arena where things like that can be
3:39
discussed unfortunately with the
3:41
American vet I cannot expect that there
3:43
will be much success in passing any
3:45
resolutions but nonetheless it will show
3:48
that the world is opposed to this mad
3:52
ethnic cleansing plan that the American
3:56
president has
3:57
proposed you’re you’re a really smart
4:00
person and understands you know
4:03
sometimes things are said and they may
4:06
hide a different meaning do you see
4:09
any is there any negotiating strategy
4:12
here that you see that Trump might claim
4:14
or his acolytes might claim I have no
4:18
idea and I cannot see anything other
4:20
than a a blank wall in front of me of
4:24
total acceptance of the Israeli position
4:28
by the American government
4:30
it’s not only the president we’ve heard
4:32
also supporting calls from senators and
4:35
congressmen and other of the American
4:38
strata of politics supporting this call
4:42
so uh that is the unfortunate position
4:46
of a whole structure that has been built
4:49
in the past years in support of
4:52
Israel um as you know and as we’ve said
4:56
normalization is a big uh Strate y a big
5:00
a big goal of the United States of
5:02
Israel Etc certain Arab countries have
5:05
always done that but the crown jewel is
5:07
your country Saudi Arabia um do you see
5:11
any way I know you’re not in government
5:13
but your your king and others have said
5:16
in the past that there will be no
5:17
normalization without a pledge for a
5:20
Palestinian State and in fact for Israel
5:22
to get out of Gaza do you think that
5:24
still
5:25
holds can you see normalization
5:28
happening indeed in
5:31
and not at all this morning our foreign
5:33
Ministry issued a statement rejecting
5:36
what came out of Washington in the last
5:39
days and this has been the position of
5:42
Saudi Arabia from the beginning and even
5:45
before October 7th if you recall when
5:48
Prince Muhammad spoke with one of the
5:52
opposition television channels uh in in
5:55
America he made clear then that the path
5:58
to a clear
6:00
Palestinian state is what we want to see
6:03
as a result of any talks that we have
6:06
with the Americans
6:10
[Music]
6:17
[Music]
oooooo
Geure herriari, Euskal Herriari dagokionez, hona hemen gure apustu bakarra:
We Basques do need a real Basque independent State in the Western Pyrenees, just a democratic lay or secular state, with all the formal characteristics of any independent State: Central Bank, Treasury, proper currency, out of the European Distopia and faraway from NAT0, maybe being a BRICS partner…
Ikus Euskal Herriaren independentzia eta Mikel Torka
ooooooo
MMT: Modern Monetary Theory
Understanding how money works so that we can address climate change easily and prosperously plus
oooooo